Type of Hip Fracture Determines Load Share in Intramedullary Osteosynthesis

Abstract

The choice of the appropriate implant continues to be critical for fixation of unstable hip fractures. Therefore, the goal of this study was to develop a numerical model to investigate the mechanical performance of hip fracture osteosynthesis. We hypothesized that decreasing fracture stability results in increasing load share of the implant and therefore higher stress within the implant. We also investigated the relationship of interfragmentary movement to the fracture stability. A finite element model was developed for a cephalomedullary nail within a synthetic femur and simulated a pertrochanteric fracture, a lateral neck fracture, and a subtrochanteric fracture. The femur was loaded with a hip force and was constrained physiologically. The FE model was validated by mechanical experiments. All three fractures resulted in similar values for stiffness (462-528 N/mm). The subtrochanteric fracture resulted in the highest local stress (665 MPa), and the pertrochanteric fracture resulted in a lower stress (621 MPa) with even lower values for the lateral neck fracture (480 MPa). Thus, intramedullary implants can stabilize unstable hip fractures with almost the same amount of stiffness as seen in stable fractures, but they have to bear a higher load share, resulting in higher stresses in the implant.

Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur—A double-blinded biomechanical validation

“…The specimens were then prepared for biomechanical testing in a single leg loading configuration (Eberle et al, 2009). The distal end of each femur was potted with casting resin (RENCAST FC53, Huntsman Advanced Materials, Bergkamen, Germany) in an aluminum case that fitted into a cardan joint.…”

The importance of lag screw position for the stabilization of trochanteric fractures with a sliding hip screw: A subject‐specific finite element study

“…Based on a study by Eberle et al, 12 the force vector was pointing laterally in the coronal plane at an angle of 138 with the axis of the femoral shaft. In the sagittal plane, it was pointing posteriorly at an angle of 88 with the shaft axis.…”

Locked minimally invasive plating versus fourth generation nailing in the treatment of AO/OTA 31A2.2 fractures: A biomechanical comparison of PCCP® and Intertan nail®

“…Furthermore, specimens were stripped of soft tissue and ligaments to produce a standardised osteotomy and simplify the experimental setup. It has been demonstrated that the effect of additional muscle forces on stress distribution in implants is negligible [43]. Load was therefore applied in the vertical direction and forces produced by hip abduction or physiological gait were not taken into account.…”