The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type IIn SN 2010jl: probing dusty line-emitting shell

Abstract: I explore signatures of a possible dust formation in the late SN 2010jl that could be imprinted in the line blueshift and the radius evolution of the dusty infraredemitting shell. I propose a simple model that permits one to reproduce emission lines of blueshifted hydrogen and helium emission lines. The model suggests that the hydrogen emission originates primarily from shocked fragmented circumstellar clumps partially obscured by the absorbing cool dense shell and by unshocked ejecta. In the He 1.083 µm line … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BWC has been frequently attributed to the effects of electron scattering in SN 2010jl, and this is certainly an important effect at early times (Fransson et al 2014). At later times, however, the asymmetric, non-Lorentzian shape suggests a alternative origin for the BWC (Gall et al 2014;Chugai 2018). We therefore attribute the BWC to fast-moving ejecta.…”
Section: Model Geometrymentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The BWC has been frequently attributed to the effects of electron scattering in SN 2010jl, and this is certainly an important effect at early times (Fransson et al 2014). At later times, however, the asymmetric, non-Lorentzian shape suggests a alternative origin for the BWC (Gall et al 2014;Chugai 2018). We therefore attribute the BWC to fast-moving ejecta.…”
Section: Model Geometrymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The persistence of asymmetrical lines to very late times (>1000 days) when the photosphere has entirely receded rules out line optical depth effects at late times (Chugai 2018), and, while scattering by electrons in the CSM could cause longlasting line shifting, it would affect all lines similarly and would not account for the asymmetrical line shapes that are observed. Finally, the simultaneous presence of a significant IR excess combined with the wavelength dependence of the line blueshifting, as discussed by Gall et al (2014) and Smith et al (2012), strongly favors a dust formation scenario, with dust grains condensing in a CDS between the shock fronts or in the ejecta itself.…”
Section: Asymmetric Emission-line Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies of type IIn SNe (which, in some cases, may have an LBV as progenitor) are a good example (e.g. Smith et al 2008b;Fox et al 2009;Gall et al 2014;Andrews et al 2016;Chugai 2018). Grain growth may also be a viable mechanism as explained by Kirchschlager et al (2020).…”
Section: Potential Dust Survival From Sn Explosionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researches interpret the IR excess as the evidence of newly-formed dust (Smith et al 2012;Maeda et al 2013;Gall et al 2014), while others suggest a pre-existing and unshocked CSM dust grains (Andrews et al 2011;Fox et al 2013;Fransson et al 2014). Moreover, Bevan et al (2020) and Chugai (2018) propose that SN 2010jl presents both evidence of pre-existing dust in CSM and newly-formed dust in cold dense shell and/or ejecta. Gall et al (2014) derived the extinction curves of SN 2010jl from the attenuation of emission lines, and found rapid (in 40 -240 days) dust formation and inferred the presence of very large (> 1 micron) grains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%