2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2013.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type II tympanoplasty in chronic cholesteatoma and granulomatous otitis media – Distant results of otosurgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of hearing improvement decreases with the increasing extent of damage to the ossicular chain, which was also confirmed by the current analysis [13][14][15]. The least favourable effect was observed in patients with damage to the stapedial superstructure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of hearing improvement decreases with the increasing extent of damage to the ossicular chain, which was also confirmed by the current analysis [13][14][15]. The least favourable effect was observed in patients with damage to the stapedial superstructure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The least favourable effect was observed in patients with damage to the stapedial superstructure. As confirmed by other authors, preservation of intact stapes is of key importance in hearing improvement, as it offers a possibility to use modelled autologous incus and placing it on the stapes under the reconstructed tympanic membrane [14][15][16][17]. Partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) can be used in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…According to information contained in reference literature, obtaining normal suprastructure of the stapes after abnormalities were removed, and the reconstruction of the ossicular chain by placing the patient’s own modelled ossicle on the head of the stapes, results in hearing improvement in nearly a half of cases [ 12 , 13 ]. The hearing improvement in the analyzed patients was significantly better in the group with cholesteatoma than in the cases of similar damage to the ossicular chain and the co-occurrence of other lesions on the mucous of the middle ear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On examining the full texts, 92 articles were assessed as unsuitable where COM was not the primary disease (7), tympanoplasty subtypes were not the primary intervention (11), the article was not published in English (5), the article did not contain long‐term hearing outcomes (68) or the presented data were too limited (1). Thirty‐nine studies 14‐52 reporting long‐term hearing outcomes and/or complications following middle ear interventions were included for synthesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 of these studies 20,21,24,25,32,38,39,42,45,52 reported air‐bone gap (ABG) data in sufficient detail so that it could be categorized in to bins of ≤20 dB HL or ˃20 dB HL. Additionally, 14 publications 15,18,19,23,24,35,36,38,42,43,46‐48,52 reported mean pre‐ and post‐operative ABG for patients with and without cholesteatoma in sufficient detail to permit weighted averages for these subgroups to be calculated. Eight studies 18,21,24,32,34,42,45,52 also reported these data for patients that underwent ossicular reconstruction, permitting the calculation of weighted averages for this subgroup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%