Prokaryotic Toxin-Antitoxins 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33253-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type II Toxin-Antitoxin Loci, hipBA and Persisters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results also propose a thermodynamic binding order, for the HipA protein, HipB dimer, and DNA molecule in a simulated physiological environment, that is, HipB dimer bind first to DNA to form HipB 2 + DNA complex; then HipA protein binding to HipB 2 + DNA complex to form HipA + HipB 2 + DNA or 2HipA + HipB 2 + DNA complex; finally, the remaining HipA proteins combining with the HipB dimer to form the HipA + HipB 2 or 2HipA + HipB 2 complex. In addition, the binding free energy of −24.82 kcal mol −1 calculated from the simulation of FHipB 2 + DNA model is similar to that of −26.56 kcal mol −1 calculated from the HipB 2 + DNA model, which supports the experimental result that these missing residues in the HipB subunit affect insignificantly the affinity of HipB for hipBA operator DNA (Hansen et al ., ; Lewis and Hansen, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results also propose a thermodynamic binding order, for the HipA protein, HipB dimer, and DNA molecule in a simulated physiological environment, that is, HipB dimer bind first to DNA to form HipB 2 + DNA complex; then HipA protein binding to HipB 2 + DNA complex to form HipA + HipB 2 + DNA or 2HipA + HipB 2 + DNA complex; finally, the remaining HipA proteins combining with the HipB dimer to form the HipA + HipB 2 or 2HipA + HipB 2 complex. In addition, the binding free energy of −24.82 kcal mol −1 calculated from the simulation of FHipB 2 + DNA model is similar to that of −26.56 kcal mol −1 calculated from the HipB 2 + DNA model, which supports the experimental result that these missing residues in the HipB subunit affect insignificantly the affinity of HipB for hipBA operator DNA (Hansen et al ., ; Lewis and Hansen, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the C‐terminal residues 75–88, which are near by the β1 sheet in the X‐ray densities of HipB protein, are missing (Schumacher et al ., ). Furtherly, Lewis and co‐workers reported that those missing residues affect insignificantly the affinity of HipB subunit for hipBA operator DNA or HipA protein (Hansen et al ., ; Lewis and Hansen, ). Moreover, the crystal structure of the 2HipA + HipB dimer complex was solved by applying the selected area (electron) diffraction technique (Evdokimov et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, certain stresses (Maisonneuve et al, 2013), or simply stochastic gene expression (Fasani & Savageau, 2013), can result in the toxin becoming active. Several different lines of evidence implicate type II TAs in persister formation (Lewis & Hansen, 2013;Schuster & Bertram, 2013;Holden, 2015). For example, the first mutant isolated with a higher persister fraction was an Escherichia coli which had a mutation in the HIPA toxin gene (Moyed & Bertrand, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%