2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-006-0054-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type II topoisomerase activities in both the G1 and G2/M phases of the dinoflagellate cell cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Topoisomerases have been detected in various dinoflagellates (Mínguez et al, 1994;Mak et al, 2005) and it was suggested that C. cohnii type II topoisomerase unwinds condensed chromosomes of the G1 phase of the cell cycle for transcription (Mak et al, 2006). Our results also raise the possibility that these topoisomerases may be important for exposing regions of the chromosomal DNA during replication and transcription in the Symbiodiniaceae.…”
Section: Massive Changes In Abundances Of Transcripts For Enzymes Invsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Topoisomerases have been detected in various dinoflagellates (Mínguez et al, 1994;Mak et al, 2005) and it was suggested that C. cohnii type II topoisomerase unwinds condensed chromosomes of the G1 phase of the cell cycle for transcription (Mak et al, 2006). Our results also raise the possibility that these topoisomerases may be important for exposing regions of the chromosomal DNA during replication and transcription in the Symbiodiniaceae.…”
Section: Massive Changes In Abundances Of Transcripts For Enzymes Invsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These results correspond to some extent to our previous observations ( _ Zabka et al, 2014) showing that the prolonged treatment with other topoisomerase II inhibitors, ICRF-193 and doxorubicin, brings about almost complete decline in the G2-phase population and a significant accumulation of G1 cells. However, our present data clearly differ from those in animals, where ETO and EPC arrested cells in G2/M phase (Mak et al, 2005;Rello-Varona et al, 2006;Chiu et al, 2005;Litwiniec et al, 2013;Poljakov a et al, 2013). Thus, it cannot be excluded that the cell cycle checkpoints in plants are considerably less sensitive or much more refractory to DNA lesions and allow cells (after some adaptation time) to continue interphase and to enter mitotic division regardless of the persistence of DNA breaks or other types of topological abnormalities ( _ Zabka et al, 2012;Cools and De Veylder, 2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Type II topoisomerase (Topo II) is involved in DNA replication, transcription, chromatin remodeling, condensation and chromosome segregation (Mak et al, 2005;Nitiss, 2009a). In an ATP-dependent reaction, by relaxation of positively and negatively supercoiled DNA, Topo II enables the removal of knots, supercoils and catenates (Champoux, 2001;Vos et al, 2011;Lane et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide protocol that was used previously for other dinoflagellate chromosomes (34) was employed for all cell fixation and TEM specimen preparation. Dinoflagellate cells for each species were harvested, fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde-0.1 M PIPES (1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic) buffer overnight at 4°C, and then subjected to a secondary fixative of 1% osmium tetroxide-0.1 M PIPES buffer for 1 h at 4°C in the dark.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%