2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type Ia endoleaks after fenestrated and branched endografts may lead to component instability and increased aortic mortality

Abstract: Fenestrated/branched endovascular repair has a low incidence of sealing zone failure despite the increased complexity. However, development of a proximal endoleak destabilizes the repair and leads to increased mortality. Increasing complexity of design seems to improve the long-term outcome for patients requiring complex aortic repair.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,22 At 12 months, core laboratory-determined type IA endoleaks were identified in 1.9% (1/53) of patients. Although not a direct comparison, these results are in line with both fEVAR (<2% type IA endoleaks at 1 year) 23 and chEVAR (0%-6.3% type IA endoleaks in studies including >15 patients), 17,22 demonstrating the additive benefit of adjunctive EndoAnchor placement to augment proximal sealing within an otherwise hostile neck. Notably, no aneurysm sac growth, aneurysm rupture, or stent graft migration was observed at 12 months after ESAR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…17,22 At 12 months, core laboratory-determined type IA endoleaks were identified in 1.9% (1/53) of patients. Although not a direct comparison, these results are in line with both fEVAR (<2% type IA endoleaks at 1 year) 23 and chEVAR (0%-6.3% type IA endoleaks in studies including >15 patients), 17,22 demonstrating the additive benefit of adjunctive EndoAnchor placement to augment proximal sealing within an otherwise hostile neck. Notably, no aneurysm sac growth, aneurysm rupture, or stent graft migration was observed at 12 months after ESAR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, their occurrence is considered a bad prognostic sign for the durability of the repair, as many of them, regardless of the immediate success, usually recur during follow-up. 99 The rates of early types I and III endoleak were 5.8% and 2.6%, respectively, and the rates of late endoleaks were 2.2% and 3.2% in the latest meta-analysis on FEVAR versus open repair. 9 Overall, and in a recent large data (607 patients receiving four design devices), the rates of types I, II and III endoleak through the entire follow-up period (mean = 8 years) were 3%, 16% and 4.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Type I and Type Iii Endoleaksmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…O'Callaghan et al 7 reported a large experience with 924 patients, of whom 26 (2.8%) had type IA endoleak after fenestrated repair. In that study, use of more fenestrations was associated with significant decline in the rate of type IA endoleak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%