1982
DOI: 10.1086/159681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type I supernovae. I - Analytic solutions for the early part of the light curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
1,543
6
9

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,245 publications
(1,638 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
50
1,543
6
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak brightness can be estimated according to Arnett's rule (Arnett 1982), which results in absolute magnitudes of M = −11.8, −13.4, −15.0, and −16.6 for nickel masses of 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.05 M⊙, respectively, where we gauged the relation with the models of Paper I. As the diffusion time is shorter than the radioactive decay timescale, the light curves should follow the radioactive decay law immediately after the light curve peak, until the SN becomes optically thin to gamma-rays at time τ d , when the decay of the optical light curve should accelerate.…”
Section: Expected Light Curve Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak brightness can be estimated according to Arnett's rule (Arnett 1982), which results in absolute magnitudes of M = −11.8, −13.4, −15.0, and −16.6 for nickel masses of 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.05 M⊙, respectively, where we gauged the relation with the models of Paper I. As the diffusion time is shorter than the radioactive decay timescale, the light curves should follow the radioactive decay law immediately after the light curve peak, until the SN becomes optically thin to gamma-rays at time τ d , when the decay of the optical light curve should accelerate.…”
Section: Expected Light Curve Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the peak luminosity of SNIa is directly linked to the amount of radioactive 56 Ni produced in the explosion [3,5]. Hence SNIa, having different magnitudes at maximum, are probably the result of the synthesis of different amounts of radioactive 56 Ni.…”
Section: Type Ia Supernovaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we have limited information on the spectroscopic and photometric evolution of OGLE-2012-SN-006, we attempt to constrain SN parameters using the quasibolometric light curve computed before, with the initial assumption that the SN luminosity peak is mostly powered by the radioactive decays. To this aim, we fit the SN data using a toy light-curve model elaborated by Valenti et al (2008), 7 which has been shown to successfully reproduce the early-7 This model is obtained using the code of Valenti et al (2008), which is based on Arnett (1982), but accounting for the typo correction reported in Arnett (1996) -(see Wheeler et al 2014). …”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of Valenti et al (2008) is based on simple analytical approximations (Arnett 1982;Cappellaro et al 1997;Clocchiatti & Wheeler 1997), and on a division of the light curve into two periods. In the first period, the supernova is optically thick (photospheric phase); later on, it gets optically thin (nebular phase).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%