2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type I restriction-modification system and its resistance in electroporation efficiency in Flavobacterium columnare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a possible explanation of the enhanced transformation efficiency is the malfunctioning of the restriction and modification system. In this context, some studies used artificial type I restriction and modification negative strains to analyze the genetics of bacteria by enhancing their transformation efficiency . Thus, these studies support the idea that the isolates with the deletion incorporated exogenous plasmid more efficiently than the isolates without the deletion because of the deletion of type I restriction and modification gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, a possible explanation of the enhanced transformation efficiency is the malfunctioning of the restriction and modification system. In this context, some studies used artificial type I restriction and modification negative strains to analyze the genetics of bacteria by enhancing their transformation efficiency . Thus, these studies support the idea that the isolates with the deletion incorporated exogenous plasmid more efficiently than the isolates without the deletion because of the deletion of type I restriction and modification gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although significant progress has been made, still many questions remain unanswered on how this pathogenic organism elicits disease, and information concerning the bacteriological events preceding disease and death is scarce. Li et al related this lack of knowledge to the absence of an efficient molecular manipulation system for F. columnare , especially a plasmid-based inframe knockout system [66], despite two recent reports on the establishment of genetic manipulation system for the bacterium [67,68]. Li et al identified the type I restriction-modification system (R-M system) in F. columnare to improve electroporation efficiency and suggested that it would be of significant interest to examine the composition and diversity of R-M systems in strains of F. columnare in order to set up a suitable genetic manipulation system for the bacterium [66].…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deletion–accumulation effect is most likely a result of environmental enrichment in the cyclic process. For instance, all the mutants carried a deletion of the D1 fragment and most contained the D4 fragment (Table ), both of which harbored genes ( hsd RMS, mcr A, mcr BC, and mrr , Table ) encoding the restriction–modification (R-M) system, preventing the invasion of foreign DNA elements and is a barrier to genetic manipulation in host strains. Removing the genes encoding the R-M system greatly enhanced the transformation capacity. Besides, many deletion events contain the IS elements or cryptic virulence genes (Supporting Information Table S7). The deletion of these genes may also facilitate the plasmid’s stability as reported, , which might promote the improvement of the transformation efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%