2006
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type I interferon response against viral and non‐viral gene transfer in human tumor and primary cell lines

Abstract: The non-viral gene transfer methods have gained more interest in recent years due to their better safety profiles when compared to their viral counterparts. However, the efficiency of non-viral gene transfer is well below those reached by viral vector systems. The type I interferon response induced by non-viral methods may in part contribute to this inefficiency, while most currently used viral gene transfer vectors fail to induce or are able to suppress type I IFN response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 Once activated, innate receptors regulate type I interferon (IFN) and nuclear factor-kB-dependent gene expression, or process cytokines such as pro-interleukin (IL)-1b to their active and secreted forms. AAV vectors do not appear to engage pattern recognition receptors such as toll-like receptors, 22 fail to induce type I IFN responses 23 and do not induce IL-1b processing (Zaiss and Muruve, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Innate Immunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Once activated, innate receptors regulate type I interferon (IFN) and nuclear factor-kB-dependent gene expression, or process cytokines such as pro-interleukin (IL)-1b to their active and secreted forms. AAV vectors do not appear to engage pattern recognition receptors such as toll-like receptors, 22 fail to induce type I IFN responses 23 and do not induce IL-1b processing (Zaiss and Muruve, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Innate Immunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein concentration was measured with the Bradford method at A 595 . Western blotting against MxA protein was performed as described earlier by Rautsi et al, 20 using rabbit anti-MxA antibody (1:2,000 dilution, kindly provided by Professor Ilkka Julkunen, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland) and HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:200,000 dilution, Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK).…”
Section: Western Blottingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One characteristic of Saos2LM7 cells that makes them remarkably sensitive for oncolytic SFV could be their defective innate immune response. We studied here the MxA response to infection with VA7-EGFP in Saos2LM7 cells with a method previously described by Rautsi and colleagues (40). No accumulation of MxA was observed (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…7 This hypothesis is supported by the fact that similar pattern of rapid emergence of resistant cell population was observed in A549 lung carcinoma cells infected with the VA7-EGFP (39). A549 cells display a robust type I IFN response and strong MxA expression against SFV infection (40). The type I IFN response and the MxA protein itself have been found to inhibit SFV infection both in vitro and in vivo (41,(42)(43)(44)(45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%