2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.612374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type I Interferon Controls Propagation of Long Interspersed Element-1

Abstract: Background: Type 1 interferons (IFN1) mediate defense against viruses but their role in regulating retrotransposon activities is unknown. Results: LINE-1 retrotransposon induces IFN1, which in turn inhibits LINE-1 retrotransposition. Conclusion: IFN1 regulate activities and propagation of LINE-1. Significance: Given that retrotransposons alter the genome, IFN1 play a role in maintenance of genomic integrity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The described interactions between infectious viruses and the transposons that comprise the bulk of mammalian host genomes are consistent with the hypothesis that transposons are symbionts integral to genomic stress responses (McClintock 1984), including antiviral immune responses (Zeng et al 2014;Yu et al 2015). The piRNA system in mammals is known to silence quasi-nonself transposon nucleic acids; our observations raise the hypothesis that, as for CRISPR/Cas in prokaryotes, truly exogenous nonself nucleic acids from infecting viruses can be targeted by piRNA-like RNAs, but that this requires genetic information flow in an unexpected retrotransposon-dependent manner (Nuñez et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The described interactions between infectious viruses and the transposons that comprise the bulk of mammalian host genomes are consistent with the hypothesis that transposons are symbionts integral to genomic stress responses (McClintock 1984), including antiviral immune responses (Zeng et al 2014;Yu et al 2015). The piRNA system in mammals is known to silence quasi-nonself transposon nucleic acids; our observations raise the hypothesis that, as for CRISPR/Cas in prokaryotes, truly exogenous nonself nucleic acids from infecting viruses can be targeted by piRNA-like RNAs, but that this requires genetic information flow in an unexpected retrotransposon-dependent manner (Nuñez et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Mechanisms to limit such activity most probably exist, which may include RNA interference, changes to the methylation status of DNA, histone modifications and a retroelement-induced type I IFN response 66 . It is possible that TREX1, RNase H2, SAMHD1 and ADAR might all have a role in the metabolism of retroelements, whereas IFIH1 may be 'set' to limit its affinity for, or response to, baseline levels of endogenous, possibly retroelement-derived, dsRNA.…”
Section: Retroelements and Dna Damage In Agsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mutations may result in inappropriate accumulation of nucleic acids and subsequent activation of RNA and DNA sensors such as MDA5 and cGAS [68] [69]. In the mouse, artificial activation of Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1) has been shown to increase the expression of IFN-I and ISGs [70]. Interestingly, silenced endogenous sequences can be activated by innate immune responses, suggesting a role for these sequences in signal amplification.…”
Section: Reactivation Of Transposable Elements Is Triggered and Sensementioning
confidence: 99%