2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41421-019-0123-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type I-F CRISPR–Cas provides protection from DNA, but not RNA phages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the exact mechanism implicating crRNA targeting for regulatory purposes remains the subject of debate. For example, in contrast to the previously reported regulatory potential for type I-F CRISPR-Cas in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (98), more recent studies did not find evidence of RNA targeting (103,104). The possible implication of Hfq RNA chaperone in crRNA interactions with potential mRNA targets implies that crRNAs could be additional components in the regulatory RNA networks and suggests an alternative mechanism for crRNA regulatory actions independent from the Cas machinery.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…However, the exact mechanism implicating crRNA targeting for regulatory purposes remains the subject of debate. For example, in contrast to the previously reported regulatory potential for type I-F CRISPR-Cas in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (98), more recent studies did not find evidence of RNA targeting (103,104). The possible implication of Hfq RNA chaperone in crRNA interactions with potential mRNA targets implies that crRNAs could be additional components in the regulatory RNA networks and suggests an alternative mechanism for crRNA regulatory actions independent from the Cas machinery.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…However, the exact mechanism implicating crRNA targeting for regulatory purposes remains the subject of debate. For example, in contrast to the previously reported regulatory potential for type I-F CRISPR-Cas in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [ 106 ], more recent studies did not find evidence of RNA targeting [ 111 , 112 ]. The possible implication of the RNA chaperone Hfq in crRNA interactions with potential mRNA targets implies that crRNAs could be additional components in the regulatory RNA networks and suggests an alternative mechanism for crRNA regulatory actions independent from the Cas machinery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…7b ). To investigate the biological relevance of the non-specific DNA binding activity, we used a phage plaquing assay by transforming the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system from P. aeruginosa into Escherichia coli to target lambda (λ) phage 28 . By co-transforming AcrIF24 or its mutants in E. coli cells, their Acr activity were tested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%