Abstract:9In bacteria and archaea, several distinct types of CRISPR-Cas systems provide adaptive 10 immunity through broadly similar mechanisms: short nucleic acid sequences derived from 11 foreign DNA, known as spacers, engage in complementary base pairing with invasive genetic 12 elements setting the stage for nucleases to degrade the target DNA. A hallmark of type I 13 CRISPR-Cas systems is their ability to acquire spacers in response to both new and previously 14 encountered invaders (naïve and primed acquisition, … Show more
“…Their relatively higher occurrence on plasmids could indicate that CRISPR-Cas systems erode faster on plasmids, or that orphan components are recruited and/or selectively maintained to perform important, but as yet unknown, biological functions. Orphan CRISPR arrays could, for instance, employ host Cas machinery in trans (Almendros et al, 2016;Deecker and Ensminger, 2020) or facilitate plasmid chromosome integration via recombination between plasmid and host-encoded CRISPRs (Varble et al, 2019(Varble et al, , 2020. On the other hand, the higher proportion of orphan components may be an artefact of CRISPR-Cas prediction tools unable to detect a conceivably greater diversity of uncharted (sub)types across plasmids.…”
Many prokaryotes encode CRISPR-Cas systems as immune protection against mobile genetic elements (MGEs), yet, a number of MGEs also harbor CRISPR-Cas components. With a few exceptions, CRISPR-Cas loci encoded on MGEs are uncharted and a comprehensive analysis of their distribution, prevalence, diversity, and function is lacking. Here, we systematically investigated CRISPR-Cas loci across the largest curated collection of natural bacterial and archaeal plasmids. CRISPR-Cas loci are widely but heterogeneously distributed across plasmids and, in comparison to host chromosomes, their mean prevalence per Mbp is higher and their distribution is markedly distinct. Furthermore, the spacer content of plasmid CRISPRs exhibits a strong targeting bias towards other plasmids, while chromosomal arrays are enriched with virus-targeting spacers. These contrasting targeting preferences dominate across the diversity of CRISPR-Cas subtypes and host taxa, highlighting the genetic independence of plasmids and suggesting a major role of CRISPR-Cas for mediating plasmid-plasmid conflicts. Altogether, CRISPR-Cas are frequent accessory components of many plasmids, which is an overlooked phenomenon that possibly facilitates their dissemination across microbiomes.
“…Their relatively higher occurrence on plasmids could indicate that CRISPR-Cas systems erode faster on plasmids, or that orphan components are recruited and/or selectively maintained to perform important, but as yet unknown, biological functions. Orphan CRISPR arrays could, for instance, employ host Cas machinery in trans (Almendros et al, 2016;Deecker and Ensminger, 2020) or facilitate plasmid chromosome integration via recombination between plasmid and host-encoded CRISPRs (Varble et al, 2019(Varble et al, , 2020. On the other hand, the higher proportion of orphan components may be an artefact of CRISPR-Cas prediction tools unable to detect a conceivably greater diversity of uncharted (sub)types across plasmids.…”
Many prokaryotes encode CRISPR-Cas systems as immune protection against mobile genetic elements (MGEs), yet, a number of MGEs also harbor CRISPR-Cas components. With a few exceptions, CRISPR-Cas loci encoded on MGEs are uncharted and a comprehensive analysis of their distribution, prevalence, diversity, and function is lacking. Here, we systematically investigated CRISPR-Cas loci across the largest curated collection of natural bacterial and archaeal plasmids. CRISPR-Cas loci are widely but heterogeneously distributed across plasmids and, in comparison to host chromosomes, their mean prevalence per Mbp is higher and their distribution is markedly distinct. Furthermore, the spacer content of plasmid CRISPRs exhibits a strong targeting bias towards other plasmids, while chromosomal arrays are enriched with virus-targeting spacers. These contrasting targeting preferences dominate across the diversity of CRISPR-Cas subtypes and host taxa, highlighting the genetic independence of plasmids and suggesting a major role of CRISPR-Cas for mediating plasmid-plasmid conflicts. Altogether, CRISPR-Cas are frequent accessory components of many plasmids, which is an overlooked phenomenon that possibly facilitates their dissemination across microbiomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.