2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type A Aortic Dissection—Experience Over 5 Decades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) remains a catastrophic event with substantial morbidity and mortality, despite advances in surgical technique and perioperative care ( 1 ). Extensive aortic arch repair for TAAD has been gradually accepted for TAAD ( 2 , 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) remains a catastrophic event with substantial morbidity and mortality, despite advances in surgical technique and perioperative care ( 1 ). Extensive aortic arch repair for TAAD has been gradually accepted for TAAD ( 2 , 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is one of the most dangerous types of AD. Although the in-hospital mortality rate of TAAD has decreased with innovations and improvements in imaging and surgical techniques, its diagnosis and treatment remain a challenge (2,3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, we know that Stanford's classification of aortic dissection is a rough classification. In recent years, many scholars have proposed a variety of subtype schemes for Stanford type A aortic dissection based on their clinical experience, anatomical location, prognosis, and other factors 2,3 . We hope that this study will further show the general demographic characteristics of the selected cases, as well as the specific anatomical location of Stanford type A aortic dissection and other individual case characteristics, so as to further judge the clinical application scope and value of this study.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%