2013
DOI: 10.1002/embr.201337371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors (m G lu1) trigger the gating of G lu D 2 delta glutamate receptors

Abstract: The orphan GluD2 receptor belongs to the ionotropic glutamate receptor family but does not bind glutamate. Ligand-gated GluD2 currents have never been evidenced, and whether GluD2 operates as an ion channel has been a long-standing question. Here, we show that GluD2 gating is triggered by type 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors, both in a heterologous expression system and in Purkinje cells. Thus, GluD2 is not only an adhesion molecule at synapses but also works as a channel. This gating mechanism reveals new … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, studies indicate a reciprocal interaction between GluD2 and mGlu1 receptors in the cerebellar Purkinje cells. GluD2 physically associates with mGlu1, PLCg, and TRPC3 channels in Purkinje cells and regulates mGlu1 function (Uemura et al, 2004;Kato et al, 2012), whereas activation of mGlu1 appears to induce gating of GluD2 (Ady et al, 2014). Our data demonstrate that this interaction may extend to GluD1 and mGlu5 in the forebrain, which may serve as a mechanism to regulate excitatory synapses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, studies indicate a reciprocal interaction between GluD2 and mGlu1 receptors in the cerebellar Purkinje cells. GluD2 physically associates with mGlu1, PLCg, and TRPC3 channels in Purkinje cells and regulates mGlu1 function (Uemura et al, 2004;Kato et al, 2012), whereas activation of mGlu1 appears to induce gating of GluD2 (Ady et al, 2014). Our data demonstrate that this interaction may extend to GluD1 and mGlu5 in the forebrain, which may serve as a mechanism to regulate excitatory synapses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In addition, the behavioral and synaptic deficits that we observe in the GluD1 KO, including impaired NMDA receptor subunit switch and impaired pruning, are deficits observed in mouse models with mGlu5 dysfunction (Vanderklish and Edelman, 2002;Xu et al, 2009;Matta et al, 2011;Cruz-Martin et al, 2012). Moreover, a recent study demonstrated ion channel gating of GluD2 when coexpressed with mGlu1 (Ady et al, 2014). Based on this converging evidence, we hypothesized that GluD1 and mGlu5 are part of a common signaling complex, and that mGlu5 signaling will be impaired in GluD1 KO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the past these subunits were considered orphans and not functional but more recent findings indicate that they are indeed functional, by modulating LTD and prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (sensorimotor gating), and their localization is not restricted to the cerebellum but includes cortical and limbic regions as well. 5054 …”
Section: Central Glutamatergic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al (2003) presented convincing evidence that mGlu 1 can regulate TRPC1 both in heterologous expression systems and in Purkinje cells. However, later studies showed that the Group I mGlu receptor current is reduced by the selective TRPC3 antagonist Pry3 (Ady et al 2014), is absent in TRPC3 KO mice and present in TRPC1 KO mice (Hartmann et al 2008). Together, these data indicate that TRPC3 channels are responsible, at least partially, for the Group I mGlu receptor current at the cerebellar parallel fiber to the Purkinje cell synapse.…”
Section: Trpc Channelsmentioning
confidence: 92%