1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00395554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes in Tasmania: prevalence and apparent regional differences

Abstract: The results of a cross-sectional study of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes in the total population of Tasmania are described. Tasmanians, predominantly of British origin, live in a temperate island situated to the south-east of mainland Australia. For males and females respectively, prevalence in 1984 was 1.1 +/- 0.1 and 0.9 +/- 0.1 per 1,000 at all ages, 0.6 +/- 0.2 and 0.5 +/- 0.2 per 1,000 in subjects aged 0-14 years, rising to 1.2 +/- 0.2 and 1.1 +/- 0.2 per 1,000 in those aged 0-29 years. Prevalence in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At registration, subjects were interviewed by telephone to obtain demographic details and core diabetes data (such as dates of diagnosis and of starting insulin treatment, date of birth, weight and height at diagnosis). The level of case ascertainment for the Register was 94% in 1984 5 and 83.4% (95% confidence interval [ell, 82.6%-84.3%) in 1995.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At registration, subjects were interviewed by telephone to obtain demographic details and core diabetes data (such as dates of diagnosis and of starting insulin treatment, date of birth, weight and height at diagnosis). The level of case ascertainment for the Register was 94% in 1984 5 and 83.4% (95% confidence interval [ell, 82.6%-84.3%) in 1995.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even within the city of Glasgow the incidence in each city ward was inversely related to the average number of people per room (Ref 12). In Norway, however, the incidence is highest in the more highly-populated southern part of the country (Ref 13) and in Tasmania a higher prevalence of the disease was found in the urban, as opposed to the rural sector of the community (Ref 14). Discrepancies such as…”
Section: Geographical Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%