2013
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.463620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type 1 Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor in Cranial Neural Crest Cell-derived Mesenchyme Is Required for Palatogenesis

Abstract: Background: How Fgfr1 mutations cause cleft palate is unclear. Results: Deleting Fgfr1 in neural crest cells caused defects in both palate shelf epithelium and mesenchyme and led to cleft palate. Conclusion: FGFR1 signaling in cranial neural crest (CNC) cells regulates palate shelf growth and fusion during palatogenesis. Significance: The finding for the first time demonstrates how FGF signaling in CNC cells regulates palatogenesis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, conditional inactivation of Fgf8 in the ectoderm of the first pharyngeal arch or Mapk1 and Mapk3 in the neural crest-derived mesenchyme produces similar phenotypes, characterized by agenesis of the maxillary and mandibular prominences and clefting of the nasal prominences (Trumpp et al 1999;Newbern et al 2008;Griffin et al 2013). Conditional inactivation of Fgfr1 in the neural crest-derived mesenchyme produced a milder phenotype of midline facial clefting and normal development of the mandible (Trokovic et al 2003;Wang et al 2013;Brewer et al 2015). Combined deletion of Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 in neural crest cells did produce a more severe facial cleft, although these mutants still fail to recapitulate the facial agenesis caused by conditional loss of Fgf8 (Park et al 2008).…”
Section: Fgf8-erk1/2 Is Required For Development Of the Facial Prominmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, conditional inactivation of Fgf8 in the ectoderm of the first pharyngeal arch or Mapk1 and Mapk3 in the neural crest-derived mesenchyme produces similar phenotypes, characterized by agenesis of the maxillary and mandibular prominences and clefting of the nasal prominences (Trumpp et al 1999;Newbern et al 2008;Griffin et al 2013). Conditional inactivation of Fgfr1 in the neural crest-derived mesenchyme produced a milder phenotype of midline facial clefting and normal development of the mandible (Trokovic et al 2003;Wang et al 2013;Brewer et al 2015). Combined deletion of Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 in neural crest cells did produce a more severe facial cleft, although these mutants still fail to recapitulate the facial agenesis caused by conditional loss of Fgf8 (Park et al 2008).…”
Section: Fgf8-erk1/2 Is Required For Development Of the Facial Prominmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sox11 has been found to regulate Fgf9 in the epithelium of the palatal shelf and receptor Fgfr2 (36) in the nasal side mesenchyme of the palatal shelf. Fgfr-mediated control of cell proliferation has previously been recognized in the lift movement of palatal shelves (53). Ablation of Fgfr1 in the ectomesenchyme results in a cell proliferation delay and cleft palate by impeding palatal shelf elevation prior to shelf fusion (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fgfr-mediated control of cell proliferation has previously been recognized in the lift movement of palatal shelves (53). Ablation of Fgfr1 in the ectomesenchyme results in a cell proliferation delay and cleft palate by impeding palatal shelf elevation prior to shelf fusion (53). However, in contrast to the clefting secondary palate in our Sox11 loss mutation that highlights the extrinsic influence of a malpositioned tongue and micrognathia on the clefting the secondary palate, the cleft palate in loss of function in Fgfr1 is due to the disturbance of cell signaling to delay cell proliferation in both the mesenchyme and epithelium of developing palatal shelves, preventing the shelves from proper elevation and fusion (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in humans, gain-of-function mutations in FGFR2 and FGFR3 have been consistently observed in individuals with Crouzon syndrome-a genetic disorder that includes craniosynostosis in its list of defects associated with the syndrome. More relevant here, however, is that a KO mouse model in which the Fgfr1 receptors are missing in the cranial neural crest (CNC) cells directly results in CLP due to failures in the proliferation and migration of said cells [14]. Likewise, research has shown that ectopic activation of Fgf8 results in increased proliferation and a failure of the palatal shelves to elevate properly [15].…”
Section: Fgf Signaling Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%