2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-009-0009-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type 1 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis in infancy

Abstract: Type 1 diabetes mellitus is considered a common form of diabetes mellitus in young people. Type 1 diabetes in infants is rare. However, the condition is rare in infants. Type 1 diabetes has not been reported in the literature in 45 days old child of an Indian population. Type 1 diabetes typically begins between the ages of 7 and 13 years, but 1-3% of patients are under 1 year of age. This communication describes a case of type 1 diabetes in a 45 days old male child which presented as diabetic ketoacidosis. It … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heavy metals, islet function and diabetes development Ya Wen Chen, 1, † Ching Yao Yang, 2, † Chun Fa Huang, 3 Dong Zong Hung, 4 Yuk Man Leung 5 and Shing Hwa Liu many kinds of the heavy metals accumulation in our organ tissue and inducing chronic toxicities. The studies that compared the levels of essential trace elements in biological samples of patients who have diabetes mellitus type 2, with those of nondiabetic control subjects, have suggested that deficiency and accumulation of some essential trace metals may play a role in the development of diabetes mellitus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavy metals, islet function and diabetes development Ya Wen Chen, 1, † Ching Yao Yang, 2, † Chun Fa Huang, 3 Dong Zong Hung, 4 Yuk Man Leung 5 and Shing Hwa Liu many kinds of the heavy metals accumulation in our organ tissue and inducing chronic toxicities. The studies that compared the levels of essential trace elements in biological samples of patients who have diabetes mellitus type 2, with those of nondiabetic control subjects, have suggested that deficiency and accumulation of some essential trace metals may play a role in the development of diabetes mellitus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 Family history is a major risk factor, and strong family history is reported to early age onset of T2DM and to also develop complications. 71 Studies from Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu, India, have also shown that 68.8% of the people affected with T2DM had a family history of diabetes and that 25.1% had a mother and 15.3% had father affected with the ailment, respectively, and that 51.6% had diabetic complications. 72 Together with all these observations indicate that the family history had a strong association with both ages of onset and complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…72 Together with all these observations indicate that the family history had a strong association with both ages of onset and complications. 71 72 Large community-based studies have shown that when compared with those at average risk, people with a strong family risk were more likely to report a diagnosis of diabetes. 73 Studies done in Qatar also indicate that people with a family history of metabolic syndrome in parents, maternal aunt, maternal grandfather, and born in consanguineous marriages had high chances of developing T2DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, studies on associations of diabetes by gender and a family history of diabetes with depressed mood have not been reported yet. Previous studies have reported that people with diabetes with a family history of diabetes smoked more (Alharithy et al, 2018; Chang, 2012) and were diagnosed at a younger age with higher BMI, larger waist circumference, and worse cerebrovascular outcomes (Alharithy et al, 2018; Annis et al, 2005; Jali et al, 2009). In this study, diabetic patients with a family history of diabetes tended to be younger ( p = .056) and have more women ( p = .022) than those without a family history of diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%