2012
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tympanic membrane retraction: An endoscopic evaluation of staging systems

Abstract: Endoscopic image capture may provide a clear objective record of TM retraction, but current staging systems have unsatisfactory reliability when applied to such images, and retraction stage correlates poorly with hearing threshold. Modification of retraction assessment to improve validity and clinical relevance is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 A recent study of rater evaluation of digital images of retraction pockets, where the rater was asked to classify retraction pockets by the Tos and Sade classification systems, again found intra-rater agreement to be fair to moderate; this is despite these classification systems being well established and in widespread use. 20 Therefore, although we accept that intra-rater reliability is a limitation to this study, the authors judge that our raters have reasonable enough intra-rater agreement to substantiate the overall results.…”
Section: Limitations Of Our Studymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…5 A recent study of rater evaluation of digital images of retraction pockets, where the rater was asked to classify retraction pockets by the Tos and Sade classification systems, again found intra-rater agreement to be fair to moderate; this is despite these classification systems being well established and in widespread use. 20 Therefore, although we accept that intra-rater reliability is a limitation to this study, the authors judge that our raters have reasonable enough intra-rater agreement to substantiate the overall results.…”
Section: Limitations Of Our Studymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As our study shows, preoperative stage of PTR is not a predictor for long incus process defect. Some authors consider that the contact of a retracted PT with the promontory increases the hearing threshold, more than a retraction involving the incus, as has been shown in an endoscopic study (15). On the contrary, in combined retractions, both proved to not be a predictor of a long incus process defect, but they did both predict a long incus process+stapes suprastructure defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…middle ear, the circular fibres which impart strength to the tympanic membrane get atrophied leading to atrophic changes in the Tympanic Membrane. 4. Atelectasis of the Tympanic Membrane:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms "atelectasis" or sometimes "adhesive otitis media" can be used to describe retraction of a large area of the pars tensa. Attempts have been made to categorise the extent of tympanic membrane retraction (1)(2)(3) though the validity of these classifications is limited (4) . However, the most commonly used classification for these Tympanic membrane retraction is Sade's Classification (1) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%