1994
DOI: 10.1016/0165-5876(94)90060-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tympanic membrane atrophy, scarring, atelectasis and attic retraction in persistent, untreated otitis media with effusion and following ventilation tube insertion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
64
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
64
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1 of the studies, the prevalence in unoperated ears was 7.5%, a value high enough to suggest to the authors that the scarring had been caused by the underlying disease. 20 Findings in the present study are consistent with that observation. We found higher rates of TM abnormalities among children in the early-and late-treatment groups who had not undergone M&T (15.4% and 19.3%, respectively) than among children in the nontrial group who had not undergone M&T (7.2%; P ϭ .011), and we found that, in children in the nontrial group who had not undergone M&T, abnormalities were essentially limited to children who had had substantial periods of MEE.…”
Section: Tm Abnormalitiessupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 1 of the studies, the prevalence in unoperated ears was 7.5%, a value high enough to suggest to the authors that the scarring had been caused by the underlying disease. 20 Findings in the present study are consistent with that observation. We found higher rates of TM abnormalities among children in the early-and late-treatment groups who had not undergone M&T (15.4% and 19.3%, respectively) than among children in the nontrial group who had not undergone M&T (7.2%; P ϭ .011), and we found that, in children in the nontrial group who had not undergone M&T, abnormalities were essentially limited to children who had had substantial periods of MEE.…”
Section: Tm Abnormalitiessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Indeed, we found higher rates of TM abnormalities in the children whose only or initial M&T was performed before 24 months of age than in those in whom the procedure was performed at older ages. In contrast, tympanosclerosis in the present study was found in 40.4% of the ears of children who had received tubes, a value relatively close to the prevalence of 31.7% reported by Kay et al 7 Fibrosis of the TM as described in the present study was probably the equivalent of the finding described by earlier authors as thickening or minor scarring, [18][19][20] a condition considered to constitute an intermediate stage in the development of tympanosclerosis. 19 In 2 previous studies of children with persistent MEE, the prevalence of thickening or minor scarring (as differentiated from tympanosclerosis) in ears that had received tubes was 12.7% 18 and 14%, 20 respectively.…”
Section: Tm Abnormalitiescontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28,30,33,36,37,46,54,64,65 Otorrhea and tympanosclerosis occurred more frequently in ears with tube placement than in ears with watchful waiting or myringotomy (low SOE). Evidence was insufficient for other harms because of either conflicting results or data reported in only a single study.…”
Section: Tympanostomy Tubes Versus Watchful Waiting or Myringotomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tympanostomy tubes lead to further atrophy of the TM and focal atelectatic areas. 16 Placement of a tube in an already atelectatic ear can result in further deterioration of existing disease. 7 Furthermore, multiple tympanostomy tubes increase the risk of TM atelectasis.…”
Section: Conmentioning
confidence: 99%