2022
DOI: 10.3390/genes13091541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TwoStepCisMR: A Novel Method and R Package for Attenuating Bias in cis-Mendelian Randomization Analyses

Abstract: Mendelian randomisation (MR) is an increasingly popular method for strengthening causal inference in epidemiological studies. cis-MR in particular uses genetic variants in the gene region of a drug target protein as an instrumental variable to provide quasi-experimental evidence for on-target drug effects. A limitation of this framework is when the genetic variant is correlated to another variant that also effects the outcome of interest (confounding through linkage disequilibrium). Methods for correcting this… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 ) to avoid weak instrument bias ( Methods ). This approach was also used in previous studies 48 50 . In supplementary mediation analyses, we found that adjusting for the exposure when estimating β NPNT-to-severity (Sobel test) also support the role of NPNT as a mediator for the effect of obesity-related exposures (BMI, body fat percentage and body fat mass) on COVID-19 severity outcomes; however, the estimated proportion mediated was modest, likely due to weak instrument bias (Supplementary Table 20 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 ) to avoid weak instrument bias ( Methods ). This approach was also used in previous studies 48 50 . In supplementary mediation analyses, we found that adjusting for the exposure when estimating β NPNT-to-severity (Sobel test) also support the role of NPNT as a mediator for the effect of obesity-related exposures (BMI, body fat percentage and body fat mass) on COVID-19 severity outcomes; however, the estimated proportion mediated was modest, likely due to weak instrument bias (Supplementary Table 20 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the product of coefficients method without adjusting for the exposure (BMI or body fat percentage) when estimating the effect of the mediator on the outcome ( β NPNT-to-severity ) to avoid weak instrument bias. This approach was also used in previous studies 48 50 . We did so because the above-mentioned exposure adjustment requires multivariable MR using NPNT and BMI (or body fat percentage; fat mass) as exposures; however, there are only two instrumental variables for NPNT ( cis -pQTL), but hundreds of instrumental variables for BMI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the above analyses, we did not adjust the exposure while estimating the effect of the mediator on the outcome (β NPNT-to-severity in Figure 7 ) to avoid weak instrument bias (see Methods ). This approach was also used in previous studies 48,49,50 . In supplementary mediation analyses, we found that adjusting for the exposure when estimating β NPNT-to-severity (i.e., Sobel test) also support the role of NPNT as a mediator for the effect of obesity-related exposures (BMI, body fat percentage, and body fat mass) on COVID-19 severity outcomes; however, the estimated proportion mediated was modest, likely due to weak instrument bias ( Supplementary Table 20 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the product of coefficients method without adjusting for the exposure (BMI or body fat percentage) when estimating the effect of the mediator on the outcome ( β NPNT-to-severity ) to avoid weak instrument bias. This approach was also used in previous studies 48,49,50 . We did so because the above-mentioned exposure adjustment requires multivariable MR using NPNT and BMI (or body fat percentage; fat mass) as exposures; however, there are only two instrumental variables for NPNT (cis-pQTL), but hundreds of instrumental variables for BMI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 The standard error of the mediated effect was then estimated by use of bootstrap simulations with 100 000 iterations. 31 Most widely employedstatistical sensitivity analyses that use mendelian randomisation methods to detect and adjust for pleiotropy cannot be conducted with only two instrumental variables. To assess potential pleiotropy of the SNPs associated with caffeine, we instead performed a phenome-wide association analysis in the MR-Base platform (lookup on 1 August 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%