2021
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two years outcomes of treating full-thickness macula hole associated with idiopathic macular telangiectasia type 2 by internal limiting membrane inverted flap technique

Abstract: Rational: Macular telangiectasia (MacTel) is an uncommon ocular disorder that can lead to legal blindness. MacTel type 2 is characterized by a bilateral loss of macular transparency, the presence of white crystals on the retina, aberrant blood vessel growth, and neurodegeneration of the macula. Full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) are a prominent cause of vision reduction in MacTel type 2, and the standard care for an FTMH is pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) to restore the FTMH and best-corrected visua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This surgical intervention requires several days of face-down positioning post-operatively. The few studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of PPV have noted no significant differences in visual acuity between MacTel eyes with macular holes treated surgically compared to those that were medically managed without surgery [ 25 ], lower rates of macular hole closure with PPV in MacTel eyes compared to idiopathic macular holes without MacTel also treated surgically [ 26 ], and overall limited reports of successful macular hole closure in a number of eyes with MacTel [ 27 , 28 ]. Hence, surgical intervention of concomitant macular holes with MacTel may not be the preferred treatment for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This surgical intervention requires several days of face-down positioning post-operatively. The few studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of PPV have noted no significant differences in visual acuity between MacTel eyes with macular holes treated surgically compared to those that were medically managed without surgery [ 25 ], lower rates of macular hole closure with PPV in MacTel eyes compared to idiopathic macular holes without MacTel also treated surgically [ 26 ], and overall limited reports of successful macular hole closure in a number of eyes with MacTel [ 27 , 28 ]. Hence, surgical intervention of concomitant macular holes with MacTel may not be the preferred treatment for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%