2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.9507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-year efficacy and safety update from JAVELIN Merkel 200 part A: A registrational study of avelumab in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma progressed on chemotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon has been observed with other similar monoclonal antibodies, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, for which mean maximum decreases of 24.5% (nivolumab in metastatic NSCLC, advanced renal cell carcinoma, and SCCHN), 20% (pembrolizumab in melanoma and NSCLC), and 17.1% (atezolizumab in NSCLC) have been reported . Consistent with other similar monoclonal antibodies, no dose adjustment is warranted for avelumab because clinical studies have shown that the benefit/risk balance is maintained with long‐term treatment …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon has been observed with other similar monoclonal antibodies, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, for which mean maximum decreases of 24.5% (nivolumab in metastatic NSCLC, advanced renal cell carcinoma, and SCCHN), 20% (pembrolizumab in melanoma and NSCLC), and 17.1% (atezolizumab in NSCLC) have been reported . Consistent with other similar monoclonal antibodies, no dose adjustment is warranted for avelumab because clinical studies have shown that the benefit/risk balance is maintained with long‐term treatment …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Consistent with other similar monoclonal antibodies, no dose adjustment is warranted for avelumab because clinical studies have shown that the benefit/risk balance is maintained with long-term treatment. 14 In patients with Merkel cell carcinoma, the timedependent effect on CL may reflect that these patients were followed longer than patients with other tumor types. The mMCC group had a median treatment duration of 105 days vs. 74 days in the total population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avelumab (antieprogrammed cell death ligand 1 [PD-L1]), pembrolizumab (antieprogrammed cell death protein 1 [PD-1]), and nivolumab (PD-1) have shown antitumor activity in patients with metastatic disease and are indicated in this population. 11,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Their efficacy as neoadjuvant treatment, however, remains to be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two‐year PFS and OS rates were 26% (29% at 1 year) and 36% (50% at 1 year), respectively. Median PFS was 2.7 months and median OS was 12.6 months, which is highly favorable for patients in this setting considering historical chemotherapy data (Table ) . Durable antitumor efficacy was observed across all patient subgroups (MCPyV‐positive, MCPyV‐negative, PD‐L1‐positive, and PD‐L1‐negative patients), although there was a trend toward a greater response rate in patients with PD‐L1‐positive as compared with PD‐L1‐negative tumors (36% vs 19%, respectively) .…”
Section: Treatment Of Metastatic MCC (M1)mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Avelumab is a fully human IgG1 anti-PD-L1 antibody that preserves antibody-mediated cytotoxicity [49]. The efficacy of avelumab was investigated in the JAVELIN Merkel 200 phase II trial, which has two main parts (A and B) [3,44,50,51]. Durable antitumor efficacy was observed across all patient subgroups (MCPyV-positive, MCPyV-negative, PD-L1-positive, and PD-L1-negative patients), although there was a trend toward a greater response rate in patients with PD-L1positive as compared with PD-L1-negative tumors (36% vs 19%, respectively) [38,50].…”
Section: Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%