2006
DOI: 10.2175/193864706783710848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Year Case Study of Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) at Broomfield, CO WWTP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The plant has been operating since November 2002 in the IFAS mode and has shown successful N and P removal (Rutt et al, 2006), but a complete analysis of the kinetics and of the microbial communities present at the plant was up to now missing. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: 1) Evaluate the nitrification rates and kinetics that occur in both the fixed-film media and the suspended activated sludge in the two-stage nitrification process at the plant; 2) Identify and quantify the nitrifying populations and their distribution on the fixed-film (media) and in the suspended activated sludge; 3) Assess the denitrification rates and kinetics at the plant and compare with conventional BNR plants; 4) Investigate the potential occurrence of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in the system via nitrogen balance.…”
Section: Introduction and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plant has been operating since November 2002 in the IFAS mode and has shown successful N and P removal (Rutt et al, 2006), but a complete analysis of the kinetics and of the microbial communities present at the plant was up to now missing. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: 1) Evaluate the nitrification rates and kinetics that occur in both the fixed-film media and the suspended activated sludge in the two-stage nitrification process at the plant; 2) Identify and quantify the nitrifying populations and their distribution on the fixed-film (media) and in the suspended activated sludge; 3) Assess the denitrification rates and kinetics at the plant and compare with conventional BNR plants; 4) Investigate the potential occurrence of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in the system via nitrogen balance.…”
Section: Introduction and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the aeration tank should be increased from 5 to 7-8 h (Table 4), which implies no excessive space requirements. To implement the IFAS-UCT configuration, three different compartments are required: the aerobic zone filled with biofilm carrier media (30-40 %) for nitrification, an anoxic zone (40 %) for denitrification, and the anaerobic (15-25 %) for TP removal (Rutt et al 2006;Albizuri et al 2010). Regarding the use of additional strategies for nitrogen removal, the EDSS proposes, as an estimate, the treatment of head returns using an emergent technology: the deammonification process (partial nitritation ?…”
Section: Scenario Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anammox). This technology can efficiently remove 15-20 % of the TN load from the influent (Rutt et al 2006). The combination of the enhanced nutrient removal of the UCT configuration with the deammonification of the head returns readily facilitates compliance with UWD discharge limits (\10 mg L -1 TN).…”
Section: Scenario Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IFAS process generally is applied in the municipal sector for enhancing nitrification or total nitrogen removal in existence of activated sludge facilities [4]. Several studies evaluated the performance of integrated fixed-film activated sludge for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment [5]. Paul et al [6] have reported that a clear spatial distribution of microbial population between follicular biomass (heterotrophs) and fixed biomass (nitrifiers) leads to high chemical oxygen demand (COD) and Nremoval performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%