2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11006-006-0101-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-weight inequalities for convolution operators in Lebesgue space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, if we take l = 1, B 1 ( x ) = K ( x ), and ϕ 1 ( y ) ≡ 1, then condition (6) is exactly the classical Lipschitz condition (4). We remark that the function K ( x ) = sin x / x satisfies conditions ( K 1 )–( K 4 ), but does not satisfy the Hörmander's condition (1) (see [11] page 5).…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, if we take l = 1, B 1 ( x ) = K ( x ), and ϕ 1 ( y ) ≡ 1, then condition (6) is exactly the classical Lipschitz condition (4). We remark that the function K ( x ) = sin x / x satisfies conditions ( K 1 )–( K 4 ), but does not satisfy the Hörmander's condition (1) (see [11] page 5).…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the assumption of Theorem 3, several authors have studied two-weight inequalities for the convolution operator T , for example [1113]. Recently, the authors [14] introduce a variant of the classical L r -Hörmander's condition in the scope of (2) and establish the weighted norm inequalities for singular integral operator with its kernel satisfying such a variant of the classical L r -Hörmander's condition.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although this looks like a small difference, such problems often behave quite differently. We mention [3,44], which work more generally on R n .…”
Section: Results (See Theorem 42 and Theorem 43)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for the case in which u = u 1 = 1 , Theorem 3 was proved in [20] by using different methods. Further, in the case 1 < p < ∞ Theorems 6 and 8 was proved in [3].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There exist other conditions stronger than condition (2) (see [9,21]). The function K(x) = (sin x)/x satisfies conditions (K1) − (K4) and does not satisfy conditions 1), 2), and Hörmander's condition (2) (see [3]).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%