2009
DOI: 10.4134/jkms.2009.46.3.523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Weight Estimates for Strong Fractional Maximal Functions and Potentials With Multiple Kernels

Abstract: Abstract. In the paper two-weight inequalities of various type for strong fractional maximal functions and potentials with multiple kernels defined on R 2 are established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, as before, 1 p = m i=1 1 p i . Similar results were derived in [12] (see also [13], Ch.4) for sublinear maximal operators. It is natural to study the appropriate potential operator with product kernels:…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where, as before, 1 p = m i=1 1 p i . Similar results were derived in [12] (see also [13], Ch.4) for sublinear maximal operators. It is natural to study the appropriate potential operator with product kernels:…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Proof of this lemma follows in the same way as in the case of (sub)linear case (see [12], [13], P. ); therefore we omit the details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for any I, J ∈ DR, where I ⊂ J and |I| = 1 2 n |J|. Remark 2.1.The definition, dyadic reverse doubling condition or reverse doubling condition associated with cubes, can be found in [8], [16], [25]. In [8], it was introduced to investigate the boundedness of the dyadic fractional maximal function.…”
Section: Definitions and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let w(x, y) = w 1 (x)w 2 (y). Then the proposition follows in the same way as the appropriate statements regarding the Hardy operators defined on R 2 + in [14], [12] (see also Theorem 1.1.6 of [13]). If v is a product weight, i.e.…”
Section: The Next Statements Deals With the Double Hardy-type Operatomentioning
confidence: 74%