Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2933575.2935315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Way Visibly Pushdown Automata and Transducers

Abstract: Automata-logic connections are pillars of the theory of regular languages. Such connections are harder to obtain for transducers, but important results have been obtained recently for word-to-word transformations, showing that the three following models are equivalent: deterministic two-way transducers, monadic second-order (MSO) transducers, and deterministic one-way automata equipped with a finite number of registers. Nested words are words with a nesting structure, allowing to model unranked trees as their … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The single-use property is more general than the more classical finite-visit restriction, used for instance in [9,19]: it requires to visit any input position a (machine-dependent) constant number of times, while single-useness only bounds the number of visits by producing transitions. Although, consequently to our results, 2VPPA single-use and finite-visit have the same expressive power, this extra modelling feature is desirable, for instance when using 2VPPA to test properties of 2VPT: single-use 2VPT are strictly more expressive than finite-visit ones, and this relaxation is crucial to capture MSO transductions [8]. Moreover, we somehow get it for free: we show that the NEx-pTime lower bound also holds for finite-visit 2VPPA.…”
Section: Contribution 4 (Applications)mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The single-use property is more general than the more classical finite-visit restriction, used for instance in [9,19]: it requires to visit any input position a (machine-dependent) constant number of times, while single-useness only bounds the number of visits by producing transitions. Although, consequently to our results, 2VPPA single-use and finite-visit have the same expressive power, this extra modelling feature is desirable, for instance when using 2VPPA to test properties of 2VPT: single-use 2VPT are strictly more expressive than finite-visit ones, and this relaxation is crucial to capture MSO transductions [8]. Moreover, we somehow get it for free: we show that the NEx-pTime lower bound also holds for finite-visit 2VPPA.…”
Section: Contribution 4 (Applications)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…VPA have been extended to two-way VPA (2VPA) [8] with the following stack constraints: in a backward reading mode, the role of the return and call symbols regarding the stack are inverted: when reading a call, exactly one symbol is popped from the stack and when reading a return, one symbol is pushed. It was shown in [8] that adding this visibly condition to two-way pushdown automata allows one to recover decidability for the emptiness problem. However, for Parikh acceptance, this restriction is not sufficient.…”
Section: Contribution 1 the Emptiness Problem For Pushdown Parikh Aumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations