1994
DOI: 10.1109/98.295359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two user location strategies for personal communications services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But its implementation is not simple and more importantly it is computationally intensive from the point of view of the mobile. We also consider the registration strategy based on the concept of disjoint registration areas 5,6 .The comparison between the di erent strategies is based on the registration rate g r , which i s the number of registration messages per cell boundary crossing and the paging rate g p , which is the number of pagings per location request.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But its implementation is not simple and more importantly it is computationally intensive from the point of view of the mobile. We also consider the registration strategy based on the concept of disjoint registration areas 5,6 .The comparison between the di erent strategies is based on the registration rate g r , which i s the number of registration messages per cell boundary crossing and the paging rate g p , which is the number of pagings per location request.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modify these parameters for the square coverage area of a cell, a cluster, or a domain. The fluid flow mobility model [33], which is also used in [12,34], assumes that MNs are moving at an average velocity of v km/hr, and their direction of movement is uniformly distributed over [0, 2π ]. Assuming that MNs are uniformly populated with a density of ρ users per km 2 in an area with boundary length L km, the rate of boundary crossing in s −1 , R, is given by R = ρvL 3600 π = 16.4 (s −1 ).…”
Section: S Y S T E M C O N F I G U R a T I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to deliver a call to MU, it is necessary to have information about its current location. This requirement has been implemented in GSM standard through HLR/VLR architecture [1][2][3]. The entire process of the mobility management component of the cellular system is responsible for two tasks:(a) Location management-that is, identification of the current geographical location or current point of attachment of a mobile unit which is required by the MSC (Mobile Switching Center) to route the call-and (b) Handoff-that is, transferring (handing off) the current (active) communication session to the next base station, which seamlessly resumes the current session using its own set of channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%