Two Typology Types of Loneliness and Problematic Internet Use (PIU): An Evidence of Indonesian Measurement

Andangsari, Esther Widhi; Dhowi, Bay

doi:10.1166/asl.2016.6740

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The research result showed the existence of loneliness' influence that affected the PIU was consistent with previous research from Caplan (2002), Morahan-Martin (2003), Song, Zymslinski-Seelig, Kim, Drent, Victor, and Omori (2014), also Andangsari and Dhowi (2016). The lonely students had a maladaptive cognition (Davis, 2001).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…The conditions associated with excessive Internet use, or dependence on the Internet among the students, could make them experiencing Problematic Internet Use (PIU). Some studies reported that there was a relationship between loneliness with PIU (Caplan, 2002;Morahan-Martin & Schumacher, 2003;Song, Zymslinski-Seelig, Kim, Drent, Victor, & Omori, 2014;Andangsari & Dhowi, 2016). Loneliness becomes the antecedence of PIU or it has the role as prior psychopathology to PIU (Davis, 2001;Caplan, 2002;Griffiths, Kuss, Billieux, & Pontes, 2016).…”

Section: Academic Procrastination Loneliness and Problematic Internmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Respondents were asked to respond to those items in 7-point scale: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(somewhat disagree), 4 (no label), 5 (somewhat agree), 6 (agree), 7(strongly agree). (Andangsari & Dhowi, 2016). The CFA results recommended eliminating 3 items which are item no.…”

Section: Selsa (Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale For Adults)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The example items on GPIUS2 among others, were "I prefer online social interaction over face to face communication", "I have used the Internet to talk with others when I was feeling isolated", "I have difficulty controlling the amount of time I spend online". Before given to the respondents, this instrument was, at first, adapted into Indonesian language and tested by the construct validity test through CFA with a valid result (χ 2 =72.07, df=58, p-value=0.0125, RMSEA=0.028 (Andangsari & Dhowi, 2016). The reliability of this instrument was α=0.906.…”

Section: Gpius2 (Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Loneliness and Problematic Internet Use (PIU) as Causes of Academic Procrastination

Andangsari

Djunaidi

Fitriana

et al. 2018

IJSSS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is now undeniable that young people and the Internet has become inseparable. Nonetheless, the uncontrolled use of it causes many problems among young adults including academic procrastination. Previous studies stated that academic procrastination lead to low of academic achievement. The reason of why young adults use the internet excessively and got negative outcomes in academic life did not stated clearly. The objective of this study was to find out the empirical evidence of PIU as a mediator between loneliness and academic procrastination. Sample consisted of 320 undergraduate students from 10 universities. Age range was 17-25 years old (M=20.17, SD=1.49). They were given three self-report questionnaires such as GPIUS2, SELSA, and TPS. Those instruments were adapted in Indonesian language. Data were analyzed with Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The results showed that the model was good fit (χ2=416.541, df=205, p<0.001, CFI=0.902, TLI=0.879, SRMR=0.068, RMSEA=0.057, 90% CI:0.049-0.065, p good to fit 0.05). This study give contribution on loneliness, PIU, and academic procrastination as one model. It also gives implication of social media using among young people and policy making in universities about students life.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Academic Procrastination Loneliness and Problematic Internmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Selsa (Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale For Adults)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Gpius2 (Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Loneliness and Problematic Internet Use (PIU) as Causes of Academic Procrastination

Andangsari

Djunaidi

Fitriana

et al. 2018

IJSSS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This edition well covers the problem not only as a psychological, but also as a sociological, psychotherapeutic, statistical, describing thereby the complex nature of the problem; -In the works of Perlman, Peplo are considered the main scientific approaches of loneliness in various conceptual, scientific and theoretical interpretations of classical and modern research schools; -J.P. Sartre "Existentialism is Humanism. Existential classical philosophical prose, affecting, including objectively, the problem of loneliness in the phenomenon of human existence; -Shagivaleeva (2014) singled out three grounds for loneliness were considered: by the levels of interaction of a human with the surrounding world by its duration; and by its origin (causes, factor structure); -In the works of Routasalo, Pitkala (2003), are considered the loneliness may be regarded as a 'geriatric giant', leading to impaired quality of life, greater need for institutional care and increased mortality; -In the works of Andangsari and Dhowi (2016) loneliness is presented like a potential detrimental factor for young people's mental health.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Loneliness As A Social Problem Of A Modern Metropolis

Blaginin¹

2018

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Loneliness in Emerging Adulthood: A Scoping Review

Kirwan,

Burns,

O’Súilleabháin

et al. 2024

Adolescent Res Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Loneliness is prevalent during emerging adulthood (approximately 18–25 years) and is an important issue given it has been linked to poorer physical and mental health outcomes. This preregistered scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the literature on loneliness in emerging adulthood, including the (a) conceptualization and measurement of loneliness, (b) loneliness theories used, (c) risk factors and outcomes examined, (d) sex-gender differences observed, and (e) characteristics of emerging adult samples previously researched. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, seven electronic databases were searched for articles focused on loneliness published from 2016 to 2021, where the mean age of participants was ≥ 18 and ≤ 25 years. Of the 4068 papers screened, 201 articles were included in the final review. Findings suggest the need for a clearer consensus in the literature regarding the conceptualization of loneliness for emerging adults and more qualitative work exploring emerging adults’ subjective experiences of loneliness. Results highlight an over-reliance on cross-sectional studies. Over two thirds of articles described their sample as university students and the median percentage of females was 63.30%. Therefore, fewer cross-sectional studies using convenience samples and more population-based, longitudinal research is needed to understand the factors predicting loneliness over time, and the downstream impact of loneliness for emerging adults.

show abstract

Two Typology Types of Loneliness and Problematic Internet Use (PIU): An Evidence of Indonesian Measurement

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Loneliness and Problematic Internet Use (PIU) as Causes of Academic Procrastination

Loneliness and Problematic Internet Use (PIU) as Causes of Academic Procrastination

Loneliness As A Social Problem Of A Modern Metropolis

Loneliness in Emerging Adulthood: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About