2011
DOI: 10.1038/nature10569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two types of luminescence blinking revealed by spectroelectrochemistry of single quantum dots

Abstract: Photoluminescence (PL) intermittency (blinking), or random switching between states of high- (ON) and low (OFF) emissivities, is a universal property of molecular emitters exhibited by dyes1, polymers2, biological molecules3 and artificial nanostructures such as nanocrystal quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, and nanowires4,5,6. For the past fifteen years, colloidal nanocrystals have been used as a model system for studies of this phenomenon.5,6 The occurrence of OFF periods in nanocrystal emission has been common… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

68
1,057
2
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 684 publications
(1,135 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(37 reference statements)
68
1,057
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that for the untreated samples not every absorbed photon results in an electron at the CBM, i.e., some of the hot electrons created immediately after absorption are cooling directly into a trap state, and thus reducing the CBM state filling responsible for the bleach signal. The surface trapping of hot carriers in CQDs has been discussed at length by Kambhampati34 and is also used to explain one form of PL intermittency, also known as “blinking.”8, 35 This additional cooling pathway for hot electrons in the CQDs before passivation also explains the decreased rise time of the bleach signal, as the population of hot electrons is depleted more rapidly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This suggests that for the untreated samples not every absorbed photon results in an electron at the CBM, i.e., some of the hot electrons created immediately after absorption are cooling directly into a trap state, and thus reducing the CBM state filling responsible for the bleach signal. The surface trapping of hot carriers in CQDs has been discussed at length by Kambhampati34 and is also used to explain one form of PL intermittency, also known as “blinking.”8, 35 This additional cooling pathway for hot electrons in the CQDs before passivation also explains the decreased rise time of the bleach signal, as the population of hot electrons is depleted more rapidly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further increases in d′ might also be attained using novel coatings that optimally target nanoparticles, reduce blinking, or interact strongly with the qdot core to enhance voltage sensitivity. [42][43][44] Optical measurements of voltage also would also benefit substantially from use of microscopy modalities with enhanced sectioning capabilities 39,45 or collection efficiencies. 46 A growing number of biocompatible surface chemistries target qdots to the exterior of cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curiously, almost every nanoscale fluorescent object is known to exhibit fluorescence blinking. For semiconductor quantum dots and solubilised chromophores, the dominant underlying molecular mechanism was shown to involve ionisation, in the former due to a photoassisted Auger process [27,28] and in the latter, longliving, dark radical states were populated via triplet states [29]. For LHC2, containing 54 chromophores, one might similarly expect radical states to be responsible for fluorescence blinking.…”
Section: Photoactive Control Over the Intrinsic Protein Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%