2002
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: A TMS and fMRI study

Abstract: Reorganization after early brain injuries is not only determined by the maturational stage of the CNS at the time of the insult (timing), but also by the structural properties, location and extent of the lesion. This study addresses the impact of different lesion extents on the type of reorganization induced in a cohort of patients with lesions of uniform structure and location (unilateral periventricular defects) and similar timing (early third trimester of pregnancy). Twelve young adult patients with congeni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
297
8
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
22
297
8
7
Order By: Relevance
“…When used in conjunction with each other, TMS, cross-correlation analysis, and distal long-latency reflexes help to elucidate the origin of the projections by which the contra-lesional hemisphere participates in the motor control of paretic hand muscles. Thus, TMS-evoked ipsilateral projections which appear to originate from branched pyramidal tract neurons in the primary motor cortex of the contra-lesional hemisphere are associated with prominent mirror movements while those projections which appear to arise from areas other than the primary motor cortex are not associated with mirror movements (Carr et al, 1993;Eyre et al, 2001;Staudt et al, 2002).…”
Section: Cerebral Palsymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When used in conjunction with each other, TMS, cross-correlation analysis, and distal long-latency reflexes help to elucidate the origin of the projections by which the contra-lesional hemisphere participates in the motor control of paretic hand muscles. Thus, TMS-evoked ipsilateral projections which appear to originate from branched pyramidal tract neurons in the primary motor cortex of the contra-lesional hemisphere are associated with prominent mirror movements while those projections which appear to arise from areas other than the primary motor cortex are not associated with mirror movements (Carr et al, 1993;Eyre et al, 2001;Staudt et al, 2002).…”
Section: Cerebral Palsymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This iMEP indicates the presence of an ipsilateral corticofugal motor projection that may be the means by which the motor cortex controls ipsilateral movements in healthy subjects (Ziemann et al, 1999). It may also mediate the enhanced participation of the less affected hemisphere after injury to the developing brain (see below) (Carr et al, 1993;Staudt et al, 2002). It is possible to identify different types of TMSevoked ipsilateral projections by comparing the characteristics of the iMEP with those of the contralateral MEP.…”
Section: Ipsilateral Mepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that the rearrangement of cortical pathways and its role in cortical plasticity have been well documented in experiments on fetal monkeys 51 and is consistent with structural plasticity of efferent cortical pathways in humans. 52 In preterm infants, major determinants of structural reorganization and plasticity of cortical connections after periventricular lesions are specific periventricular arrangement and sequential growth of subcortical afferents, cortical efferents, and corticocortical fibres, as well as the developmentally regulated expression of extracellular matrix growth substrates and axonal guidance molecules. The disturbance in the distribution of the extracellular matrix and axonal guidance molecules within periventricular crossroads of growing pathways and the 'waiting' compartment of the subplate zone may be a hitherto neglected pathogenetic mechanism in the damage of the fetal white matter after periventricular lesions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Mri and Histological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%