2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Type of Impact Load Tests, Tested on Fibre Reinforced Concrete Specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional FRC applications have seen a distinction between use of micro-fiber and macro-fiber FRCs. Micro-fiber FRCs have been widely used for plastic shrinkage control [ 137 , 138 ], impact resistance [ 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 ], and fire resistance [ 143 , 144 ]. Macro fiber FRCs have been applied in structural applications such as slabs on grade as industrial floors and road pavements [ 145 ], to a lesser degree in suspended slabs [ 146 , 147 ] and tunnel linings [ 148 , 149 ].…”
Section: Durability Of Existing Frc Infrastructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional FRC applications have seen a distinction between use of micro-fiber and macro-fiber FRCs. Micro-fiber FRCs have been widely used for plastic shrinkage control [ 137 , 138 ], impact resistance [ 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 ], and fire resistance [ 143 , 144 ]. Macro fiber FRCs have been applied in structural applications such as slabs on grade as industrial floors and road pavements [ 145 ], to a lesser degree in suspended slabs [ 146 , 147 ] and tunnel linings [ 148 , 149 ].…”
Section: Durability Of Existing Frc Infrastructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Drucker Prager (DP) model and Cap Plasticity (CP) model are reported to be better than Cap Damage model. Rehacek et al (2013) [23] reported an increase of 200% energy absorption in specimen with 80kg/m 3 fibers when compared to the specimen with 20kg/m 3 fibers. Murali et al (2014) [7] reported that the specimens with 1.5% fibers have shown an increase in impact energy at failure by 280% with hooked end steel fibers and by 260% with crimped steel fibers when compared to plain concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The drop-weight impact test is commonly used because it can easily change the input impact energy by adjusting the drop height and concrete mass. The widely accepted and simplest low-velocity impact test method is the drop-weight test proposed by ACI [9,13,14], and many experiments have been conducted by developing independently instrumented impact-testing facilities [15][16][17][18]. Wu et al [19] and Chen [15] investigated the impact characteristics of concrete using drop-weight impact tests at a strain-rate range of 10 −1 /s to 10 2 /s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%