The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1974
DOI: 10.1121/1.1903519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-tone distortion products in a nonlinear model of the basilar membrane

Abstract: Two-tone distortion products were studied in a computational model of the basilar membrane into which second- and third-order nonlinearities had been introduced. The displacement patterns produced by distortion products f2 − f1 and 2f1 − f2 resemble, in the neighborhood of the characteristic place for the frequency in question, displacement patterns produced by tones delivered at the stapes. This is not the case for distortion product 2f2 − f1. The dependence of both the amplitude and phase of distortion produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we make the reasonable assumption that the V0 component of the receptor potential is produced by the asymmetric rectification of stereocilia displacement into membrane conductance change, then the non-linearity must be localized to the micromechanics of the stereocilia and/or to the mechanoelectric transduction of these displacements into membrane conductance changes or perhaps to some mechanism that couples these processes (Weiss, 1982 (Goodman, Smith & Chamberlain, 1982), and in discharges of cochlear nerve fibres (Sachs & Abbas, 1974;Harrison, 1981) in mammals. Such non-linearities can be produced by models of cochlear macromechanics that include non-linear damping of the cochlear partition (Hubbard & Geisler, 1972;Kim, Molnar & Pfeiffer, 1973;Hall, 1974Hall, , 1977a (Crawford & Fettiplace, 1980a, b, 1981 Fettiplace & Crawford, 1978& Crawford, , 1980; and in vivo in inner hair cells in the organ of Corti in the guinea-pig, Caviaporcellus, (Russell & Sellick, 1977, 1978Sellick, 1979;Brown, Nuttall, Masta & Lawrence, 1981) and in the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus, (Goodman, Smith & Chamberlain, 1982 Crawford & Fettiplace (1980a have interpreted this result to indicate that a substantial fraction of the frequency selectivity of responses to acoustic stimuli is due to resonant electrical properties of the hair-cell membrane. According to their view, frequency selectivity in their preparation is determined by a broadly selective mechanical filter that represents transmission to the mechanical input to the hair cell followed by a sharply selective electrical resonance of the hair-cell membrane.…”
Section: Frequency-dependent Compressive Non-linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we make the reasonable assumption that the V0 component of the receptor potential is produced by the asymmetric rectification of stereocilia displacement into membrane conductance change, then the non-linearity must be localized to the micromechanics of the stereocilia and/or to the mechanoelectric transduction of these displacements into membrane conductance changes or perhaps to some mechanism that couples these processes (Weiss, 1982 (Goodman, Smith & Chamberlain, 1982), and in discharges of cochlear nerve fibres (Sachs & Abbas, 1974;Harrison, 1981) in mammals. Such non-linearities can be produced by models of cochlear macromechanics that include non-linear damping of the cochlear partition (Hubbard & Geisler, 1972;Kim, Molnar & Pfeiffer, 1973;Hall, 1974Hall, , 1977a (Crawford & Fettiplace, 1980a, b, 1981 Fettiplace & Crawford, 1978& Crawford, , 1980; and in vivo in inner hair cells in the organ of Corti in the guinea-pig, Caviaporcellus, (Russell & Sellick, 1977, 1978Sellick, 1979;Brown, Nuttall, Masta & Lawrence, 1981) and in the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus, (Goodman, Smith & Chamberlain, 1982 Crawford & Fettiplace (1980a have interpreted this result to indicate that a substantial fraction of the frequency selectivity of responses to acoustic stimuli is due to resonant electrical properties of the hair-cell membrane. According to their view, frequency selectivity in their preparation is determined by a broadly selective mechanical filter that represents transmission to the mechanical input to the hair cell followed by a sharply selective electrical resonance of the hair-cell membrane.…”
Section: Frequency-dependent Compressive Non-linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introducing nonlinearity to the damping coefficient of cochlear models ͑Kim et Hall, 1974͒ enabled the simulation of distortion products ͑DPs͒ and other nonlinear responses. In several subsequent studies, the damping coefficient was allowed to be negative at low intensity so sounds were amplified in a frequency-and place-specific manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is certainly not a long-term effect, it is caused by variations in signal transmission that are as fast as the waveforms of the components of the stimulus. The effect can be explained, for instance, by assuming that the damping in the auditory filtering process depends upon the instantaneous amplitude of the filtered stimulus (Hall 1974) but this explanation is certainly not the only possible one. 5.…”
Section: Filtering and Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%