Rats pre-exposed to stimuli in one locale failed to show an effect from this pre-exposure when presented with the stimuli in a second locale. Pre-exposure in a locale did affect subsequent choice in that same locale. These results do not replicate a recent report of the effects of pre-exposure.Stimulus satiation theory (Glanzer, 1953) predicts that exposure of an organism to one stimulus of a pair should make the organism show a preference for the other stimulus of the pair subsequently. This prediction should hold even when pre-exposure and choice take place in different locales. Walker et al (1955) found no significant effect from preexposure in one locale on subsequent choice in aT-maze. However, they compared the observed alternation to an expected level of 50%. They made no attempt to measure position preferences in the maze and to calculate a modified expected level of alternation (Dember & Fowler, 1958).Pate (1967) also reported no significant effect from pre--exposure in one locale on choice in a second locale. However, Pate & Anders (1967) have reported a significant effect. Although they use an alternation measure without correcting for position preferences, they do report sufficient data for an appropriate analysis to be made. Of 30 rats pre-exposed to white (W), 5 subsequently chose W while of 30 rats pre-exposed to black (B), 17 subsequently chose W (x 2 = 3.89, df = I, p < 0.05). Detailed analyses indicate that only the males show an effect from pre-exposure.The present experiments were designed to investigate these discrepant results, using appropriate statistical analyses.STUDY I Procedure. The Ss were 30 male and 30 female rats from the Charles River Breeding Laboratories, strain CD, 95 days old. They were given ad lib food and water during these studies unless noted otherwise.On Days I to 5 and 8 to 12 each rat was placed alone for four min in a wooden box 22 in. by 6 in. high covered with wire netting. On Day IS a T-maze was constructed from three of these boxes and B inserts were placed on the walls of one arm and W inserts in the other arm. Each rat was given 3 min to choose to enter one arm. 2 On Day 17 each rat was tested once for the effects of pre-exposure. The rat was placed in a box II in. by 6 in. by 6 in. high with B or W inserts for 5 min. The rat was then placed in the T-maze and allowed to enter one arm. On Day 24 each rat was again tested but was pre-exposed to the other stimulus to that pre-exposed on Day 17.On Day 33 each rat was tested as on Day 17. R1lsuits. The rats showed a significant position preference on Day 15. Of 57 choices 40 were to B (z = 2.91, binomial p = 0.002). There was no sex difference (x 2 = 1.15, df = I, n. s.).On Day 17, of the 30 rats pre-exposed to B, 21 subsequently chose B and of the 30 rats pre-exposed to W, 18 subsequently chose B (x 2 = 0.29, df = I, n. s.).3On Day 24, of the 30 rats pre-exposed to B, 13 subsequently chose B and of the 30 rats pre-exposed to W, 20 subsequently chose B (x 2 = 2.42, !If = I, n. s.).On Day 33, of 29 rats2 pre-exposed ...