2020
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202000210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two‐Terminal Direct Wafer‐Bonded GaInP/AlGaAs//Si Triple‐Junction Solar Cell with AM1.5g Efficiency of 34.1%

Abstract: The terrestrial photovoltaic market is dominated by single‐junction silicon solar cell technology. However, there is a fundamental efficiency limit at 29.4%. This is overcome by multijunction devices. Recently, a GaInP/GaAs//Si wafer‐bonded triple‐junction two‐terminal device is presented with a 33.3% (AM1.5g) efficiency. Herein, it is analyzed how this device is improved to reach a conversion efficiency of 34.1%. By improving the current matching, an efficiency of 35% (two terminals, AM1.5g) is expected.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main challenge of the III–V/Si approach is the lattice constant mismatch of 4% between Si and III–V semiconductors with appropriate bandgaps such as GaAs and GaIn 0.5 P 0.5 . Direct wafer bonding of the Si bottom cell to the III–V tandem cell stack has been used successfully to overcome the mismatch and reach a conversion efficiency of 34.1% [ 4 ] for a GaInP/AlGaAs/Si design in a 2‐terminal configuration. With a 4‐terminal configuration, a value of 35.9% [ 5 ] was achieved via mechanical stacking of the individual subcells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge of the III–V/Si approach is the lattice constant mismatch of 4% between Si and III–V semiconductors with appropriate bandgaps such as GaAs and GaIn 0.5 P 0.5 . Direct wafer bonding of the Si bottom cell to the III–V tandem cell stack has been used successfully to overcome the mismatch and reach a conversion efficiency of 34.1% [ 4 ] for a GaInP/AlGaAs/Si design in a 2‐terminal configuration. With a 4‐terminal configuration, a value of 35.9% [ 5 ] was achieved via mechanical stacking of the individual subcells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GaAs‐based cell enhances device efficiency, whereas the Si cell is a low‐cost bottom cell that is highly sensitive in the long‐wavelength region. Theoretically, the efficiency of GaAs//Si MJ solar cells can exceed 30%, leading to a considerable increase in research and development on GaAs//Si MJ solar cells 14–26 . Recently, an InGaP/GaAs//Si three‐junction device with a four‐terminal configuration and transparent insulating bonding layer achieved an efficiency of 35.9% 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, the efficiency of GaAs//Si MJ solar cells can exceed 30%, leading to a considerable increase in research and development on GaAs//Si MJ solar cells. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Recently, an InGaP/GaAs//Si three-junction device with a fourterminal configuration and transparent insulating bonding layer achieved an efficiency of 35.9%. 27 With a two-terminal configuration, a three-junction InGaP/InGaAsP//Si device achieved an efficiency of 34.5%, which was realized using surface activation for wafer bonding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multijunction solar cells have the highest photoelectric conversion efficiency [ 1,2 ] through the optimal utilization of the broad solar spectrum with vertically stacked tandem subcells. [ 3,4 ] Inverted metamorphic multijunction (IMM) technology [ 5–8 ] prevents the degradation of the top cell by finally growing lattice mismatches to obtain three‐junction or even more junction solar cells. According to the detailed balance limit, [ 9 ] the practical efficiencies of multijunction solar cells are expected to be close to the theoretical maxima, [ 10,11 ] but the development of more than three subcells is difficult due to the larger lattice mismatch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%