1996
DOI: 10.3109/09273979609087733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Techniques to Evaluate Visual Acuity from the Age of 18 Months

Abstract: Two methods to measure visual acuity in children aged 18 months and upwards are described, the Kolt-test and the O-test. The validity of the tests was evaluated. These new tests are based on the ability of small children to identify symbols of increasing complexity as they grow older. Thus, a circle is recognized at 12 months, and a cross at about 24 months, while recognition of a triangle and a square comes in between. Correct performance is rewarded. Simplified procedures permit testing children with visual … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VA for the pupils in Grade 1 was performed with the Kolt-test (Lithander 1996;1997) using a testing distance of 3 metres. The symbols used were squares, crosses, circles and triangles printed in rows according to Snellen's principle with correct responses on matching symbols being rewarded with music.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VA for the pupils in Grade 1 was performed with the Kolt-test (Lithander 1996;1997) using a testing distance of 3 metres. The symbols used were squares, crosses, circles and triangles printed in rows according to Snellen's principle with correct responses on matching symbols being rewarded with music.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equipment made available for Group 1 included: ô For Grade 6, Snellen's E chart, testing distance 6 m. ô For Grade 1, the Kolt-test (Lithander 1996) testing distance 3 m. Group 2 was involved in screening for externally visible eye diseases in the school classrooms, and was composed of medical students under the supervision of a senior eye doctor. Trachoma, conjunctivitis and allergies were registered and treated on the spot, whereas all other pathology, including strabismus, was referred to the paediatric ophthalmologist.…”
Section: Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening was undertaken by trained medical students involved in their 6th year of study at Sultan Qaboos University, with the assistance of supervisors. The 6-year-olds were tested for VA at a distance of 3 meters with the Kolt-test (Lithander 1996(Lithander , 1998, while the 12-year-olds were tested with the linear E-chart at 6 meters. If VA was found to be less than 0.5 in one or both eyes, they were referred to the paediatric ophthalmologist for a more detailed examination involving a complete eye examination which included cycloplegic retinoscopy in a specially prepared, darkened room.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be interesting to investigate whether practice effects with other optotype categories, such as letters or digits, are larger or smaller, and whether the confusion matrix [56], i.e., the probabilities that certain letter pairs are confused, changes with practice. Qualitative data reported by Cavazos et al [7] and Rassow et al [8] suggest that similar practice effects can be expected with letter optotypes and with the Kolt test [57], and improvements in the contrast threshold in peripheral letter recognition in noise have been reported [58]. Due to the heterogeneity of letter optotypes, there may be more potential for improvement with letters than with Landolt Cs, although one may argue that the every-day reading practice should have caused letter acuity to reach a ceiling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%