Abstract:AbstractAdvanced generation multi-parent populations (MPPs) are a valuable tool for dissecting complex traits, having more power than GWAS to detect rare variants, and higher resolution than F2 linkage mapping. To extend the advantages of MPPs in budding yeast, we describe the creation and characterization of two outbred MPPs derived from eighteen genetically diverse founding strains. We carried out de novo assemblies of the genom… Show more
“…For instance, we do find evidence that two specific regions of the genome exhibit similar dynamics in haplotype frequencies, compared to similar prior work; Burke et al 20 previously implicated these regions as potentially driving adaptation for frequent outcrossing. We also compared our results to those of Linder et al 23 which features synthetic populations constructed using the same founder strains present in this study. However, here we did not find it was the case that haplotypes most common in their populations on average are also the most common in our populations.…”
Section: Evidence For Adaptation To Outcrossingmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This particular haplotype caller was developed specifically to estimate haplotype frequencies in multiparent populations when founder haplotypes are known. A full description of the algorithm being used, and results of empirical validation can be found in Linder et al (2020).…”
Section: Haplotype Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, if there is substantial variation in mating efficiencies among founding strains, this could lead to the over-representation of certain haplotypes belonging to strains that mate most efficiently. By contrast, the second approach for constructing synthetic populations is more complex and involves some level of pairwise crossing between founders [22][23][24][25]29 . While this approach is significantly more labor-intensive and time-consuming, it perhaps has advantages in terms of producing populations that have more equal founder haplotype representation and, consequently, higher levels of genetic variation.…”
Multiparent or synthetic recombinant populations those created by combining distinct isogenic founders to establish a single recombinant background have emerged as a useful tool for dissecting the genetics of complex traits. Synthetic recombinant populations can be used to derive inbred lines in which quantitative traits can be mapped, or the recombinant populations themselves can be sampled for experimental evolution. Especially for the latter application, investigators generally value maximizing genetic variation in a recombinant population; in other words, a population harboring relatively equal contributions of the genetic backgrounds of each isogenic founder strain is a desirable resource. It is well-documented that in evolution experiments initiated from recombinant or outbred ancestral populations, the subsequent adaptation that occurs in evolved populations is driven by standing genetic variation, rather than de novo mutations. Despite the demonstrated importance of initial genetic variation to the adaptive process, little has been done to systematically evaluate methods of constructing a synthetic recombinant population, for creating resources for evolution experiments. Here we seek to address this issue by comparing patterns of genetic variation in different synthetic recombinant populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae created using one of two combination strategies: pairwise crossing of isogenic strains or simple mixing of strains in equal proportion. We also explore the impact of the varying the number of parental strains used in each strategy. We find that more genetic variation is initially present and subsequently maintained over generations when population construction includes a round of pairwise crossing. We also observe that when using a given crossing strategy, increasing the number of parental strains typically increases genetic diversity. In summary, we suggest that when creating recombinant populations for use in experimental evolution studies, simply mixing founder strains in equal proportion may limit the adaptive potential of that population.
“…For instance, we do find evidence that two specific regions of the genome exhibit similar dynamics in haplotype frequencies, compared to similar prior work; Burke et al 20 previously implicated these regions as potentially driving adaptation for frequent outcrossing. We also compared our results to those of Linder et al 23 which features synthetic populations constructed using the same founder strains present in this study. However, here we did not find it was the case that haplotypes most common in their populations on average are also the most common in our populations.…”
Section: Evidence For Adaptation To Outcrossingmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This particular haplotype caller was developed specifically to estimate haplotype frequencies in multiparent populations when founder haplotypes are known. A full description of the algorithm being used, and results of empirical validation can be found in Linder et al (2020).…”
Section: Haplotype Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, if there is substantial variation in mating efficiencies among founding strains, this could lead to the over-representation of certain haplotypes belonging to strains that mate most efficiently. By contrast, the second approach for constructing synthetic populations is more complex and involves some level of pairwise crossing between founders [22][23][24][25]29 . While this approach is significantly more labor-intensive and time-consuming, it perhaps has advantages in terms of producing populations that have more equal founder haplotype representation and, consequently, higher levels of genetic variation.…”
Multiparent or synthetic recombinant populations those created by combining distinct isogenic founders to establish a single recombinant background have emerged as a useful tool for dissecting the genetics of complex traits. Synthetic recombinant populations can be used to derive inbred lines in which quantitative traits can be mapped, or the recombinant populations themselves can be sampled for experimental evolution. Especially for the latter application, investigators generally value maximizing genetic variation in a recombinant population; in other words, a population harboring relatively equal contributions of the genetic backgrounds of each isogenic founder strain is a desirable resource. It is well-documented that in evolution experiments initiated from recombinant or outbred ancestral populations, the subsequent adaptation that occurs in evolved populations is driven by standing genetic variation, rather than de novo mutations. Despite the demonstrated importance of initial genetic variation to the adaptive process, little has been done to systematically evaluate methods of constructing a synthetic recombinant population, for creating resources for evolution experiments. Here we seek to address this issue by comparing patterns of genetic variation in different synthetic recombinant populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae created using one of two combination strategies: pairwise crossing of isogenic strains or simple mixing of strains in equal proportion. We also explore the impact of the varying the number of parental strains used in each strategy. We find that more genetic variation is initially present and subsequently maintained over generations when population construction includes a round of pairwise crossing. We also observe that when using a given crossing strategy, increasing the number of parental strains typically increases genetic diversity. In summary, we suggest that when creating recombinant populations for use in experimental evolution studies, simply mixing founder strains in equal proportion may limit the adaptive potential of that population.
“…With the use of large populations with segregating alleles, phenotypes can be mapped to genotypes. This approach has been particularly rewarding in yeast, where QTLs have been shown to explain over 70% of the narrow-sense heritability of traits [28][29][30][31][32][33]. However, these panels offer extreme under-sampling of the functional variation that could segregate in natural populations.…”
Section: Cell Panels From Model Organism Grpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individuals can also be inbred to create a panel of recombinant inbred (RI) lines that are homozygous, reproducible genetic mosaics of the founder strains. Such MPP panels have now been generated for in vitro studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using four and 18 fully sequenced founder strains [33,34] (Table 1).…”
Section: Cell Panels From Model Organism Grpsmentioning
We describe the results of a 200 generation Evolve and Resequence (E&R) study initiated from an outbred dipliod recombined synthetic base population derived from 18 genetically diverse founders. Replicate populations were maintained at large effective population sizes (>105 individuals), exposed to several different chemical challenges over 12 weeks of evolution, and whole-genome resequenced. Weekly forced outcrossing implies a per gene per cell-division recombination rate higher than that achieved in Drosophila E&R studies. In 55 sexual populations we observe large fitness gains and highly repeatable patterns of genome-wide haplotype change within each chemical challenge. There was little evidence for pervasive pleiotropy, as evidenced by patterns of haplotype change between drug treatments. Within treatment adaptation appears highly polygenic with almost the entire genome showing significant consistent haplotype change. Finally, adaptation was almost always associated with only one of the 18 founder alleles, suggesting selection primarily acts on rare variants private to a founder or haplotype blocks harboring multiple mutations. This observation contradicts the notion that adaptation is often due to subtle frequency shifts at intermediate frequency variants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.