1976
DOI: 10.1080/03637757609375917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two studies of the effects of linguistic diversity upon judgments of communicator attributes and message effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesised that context has an additive effect on listeners' judgments with greater denigration of speakers in employment interview than in conversational situations. Our failure to replicate findings by Bradac et al (1976) and Street & Brady (1982) can possibly be explained by two reasons. First, the power of the statistical tests was only moderate and thus there is the possibility of a Type-II error, especially since the context effects were in the predicted directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We hypothesised that context has an additive effect on listeners' judgments with greater denigration of speakers in employment interview than in conversational situations. Our failure to replicate findings by Bradac et al (1976) and Street & Brady (1982) can possibly be explained by two reasons. First, the power of the statistical tests was only moderate and thus there is the possibility of a Type-II error, especially since the context effects were in the predicted directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Bradac, Konsky & Davies (1976) proposed that interaction context has an additive effect on listeners' evaluative reactions to speech behaviour. In that study, receivers judged messages more favourably in an informal setting than in a formal setting regardless of amount of lexical diversity in the message.…”
Section: Interaction Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and by variations in vocal presentation from one message version to another (Bradac, Konsky, & Davies, 1976;Bradac & Mulac, 1984a;Mulac, 1976;O'Barr, 1982). In other words, the internal validity of transcribed message experiments is potentially relatively high (Bradac, 1983;Cook & Campbell, 1979).…”
Section: Powerful/powerless Talkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…and by variations in vocal presentation from one message version to another (Bradac, Konsky, & Davies, 1976;Bradac & Mulac, 1984b;OBarr, 1982). In other words, the internal validity of transcribed message expcriments is potentially relatively high (Bradac, 1983: Cook & Campbell, 1979.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%