2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-step water-splitting at 1273–1623K using yttria-stabilized zirconia-iron oxide solid solution via co-precipitation and solid-state reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the data in Figure 2 reveal that particle growth in subsequent steps is limited and is only notable for the materials with the highest iron loadings. The hydrogen production values over these materials are similar [27,32] or even better [34] than previously reported values.…”
Section: Ws H 2 Productionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the data in Figure 2 reveal that particle growth in subsequent steps is limited and is only notable for the materials with the highest iron loadings. The hydrogen production values over these materials are similar [27,32] or even better [34] than previously reported values.…”
Section: Ws H 2 Productionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although previous studies [10,20,[25][26][27][28][29][32][33][34] have investigated the reactivity of zirconiasupported and yttria-stabilized zirconia-supported iron oxides, no study has characterized these materials in detail and critically compared different zirconia supports to further the understanding of these materials in the production of hydrogen via thermochemical water splitting. In this study, nanoparticle zirconia supports were used in an attempt to increase the interaction between the iron oxide and the zirconia support, and the results were compared to iron oxide supported on a conventional zirconia support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Previous works have examined various chemical aspects of the second step, including identification of reaction [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] These configurations offered high Zn-to-ZnO conversions over short residence times due to augmented reaction kinetics and heat/mass transfer. However, the reactions primarily occurred heterogeneously outside the aerosol jet flow on surfaces with Zn deposition, making the ZnO recovery, process control and scaleup problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various ferrite powders synthesis techniques have been pursued from solid, liquid or gaseous precursors, among others co-precipitation [95], aerial oxidation of aqueous suspensions of Fe(II) hydroxide [96,97], sol-gel [98], atomic layer deposition [99,100], combustion synthesis [86,101] and spray pyrolysis [102]. Comparative testing of ferrite powders has identified the temperature ranges recommended for cyclic operation as well as the effects of process parameters on H 2 /O 2 yields [86,89,103].…”
Section: The Ferrites' Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%