2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00353.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-step three-field lymph node dissection is beneficial for thoracic esophageal carcinoma

Abstract: Aggressive surgery including extensive lymph node dissection is considered necessary to improve the long-term survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma. While three-field lymph node dissection is widely performed for patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma, cervical lymph node metastasis is uncommon. In order to reduce surgical stress, we have developed a two-step three-field lymph node dissection procedure for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. In the first-step operation, total thoracic esophagectomy th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, there's also some series showed the similar surgical outcomes in Table 2 with the 5-year OS rates range from 41.9% to 73.2% (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)51), which is better than the outcome of 2-FL in Table 4 (14,16,(22)(23)(24). The mortality rates maintained between 1.2% and 10.4%, which is lower than that in 2-FL (14,16,(22)(23)(24)(25). Akiyama (52) reported the significant survival difference between 2-FL and 3-FL (38.3% versus 55.0% P=0.0013) after R0 resection in 717 patients.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, there's also some series showed the similar surgical outcomes in Table 2 with the 5-year OS rates range from 41.9% to 73.2% (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)51), which is better than the outcome of 2-FL in Table 4 (14,16,(22)(23)(24). The mortality rates maintained between 1.2% and 10.4%, which is lower than that in 2-FL (14,16,(22)(23)(24)(25). Akiyama (52) reported the significant survival difference between 2-FL and 3-FL (38.3% versus 55.0% P=0.0013) after R0 resection in 717 patients.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Thus the way of treating the esophageal cancer is contradicted. Series showed in Tables 2,4 have already demonstrated that 3-FL in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus with higher survival and less mortality and morbidity when compared with 2-FL (14,16). Even some western scholars have reported the outcomes of 3-FL as well.…”
Section: Tumor Types In 3-flmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations