2014
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2013.2283236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Step Sparse Coding for the Pan-Sharpening of Remote Sensing Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the real data experiments, since there is no reference HR MS image, the "quality with no reference" (QNR) measurement is used to evaluate different pansharpened results objectively. 35 The proposed method is compared with five popular fusion algorithms: AIHS, 7 Wavelet, 11 PN-TSSC, 19 SparseFI, 20 and J-SparseFI. 21 The results of AIHS method are gotten from the software developed by Rahmani et.al.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the real data experiments, since there is no reference HR MS image, the "quality with no reference" (QNR) measurement is used to evaluate different pansharpened results objectively. 35 The proposed method is compared with five popular fusion algorithms: AIHS, 7 Wavelet, 11 PN-TSSC, 19 SparseFI, 20 and J-SparseFI. 21 The results of AIHS method are gotten from the software developed by Rahmani et.al.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17] Recently, inspired by sparse representation techniques, some researchers have achieved great success in data fusion. [18][19][20][21] The initial work is proposed by Li and Yang. 18 Then, Jiang et al 19 proposed a two-step sparse coding method with patch normalization (PN-TSSC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional pan-sharpening algorithms can be divided into three major branches: Component Substitution (CS) [1][2], Detail Injection (DI) [3] [4], and regularization constraint model based methods [5] [6]. In the former two branches, the fusing process is usually split into discrete steps, instead of end-to-end mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four metrics: Q, ERGAS, SAM, and SCC are employed to quantify its accuracy in spatial and spectral domains, with the original MS image as ground truth. The performances of DRPNN are compared with five algorithms from different branches for comparisons with the proposed network, including Component Substitution: GS [1], Detail Injection: MTF-GLP [3], SFIM [4], regularization constraint models: ISTS [5] based on total variation and TSSC [6] based on sparse representation. Besides these traditional algorithms, PNN [10], a shallow CNN without recidual learning and skip connection has also been included for comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%