2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-step pull-through colo-anal anastomosis aiming to avoid stoma in rectal cancer surgery: A “real life” study in a developing country

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-stage pull-through technique could be chosen as first-choice procedure, considering similar rates of short term complications and comparable 1-year oncological and functional outcomes, compared to conventional coloanal anastomosis technique, also avoiding the presence of diverting ileostomy [17] , [20] , [32] , [33] . Furthermore, no significant difference in terms of early post-operative morbidity (frequency of any morbidity, presence of grade 3b morbidity and Comprehensive Complication Index score), has been reported between Turnbull-Cutait technique and standard one-stage coloanal anastomosis [18] , [19] , [34] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two-stage pull-through technique could be chosen as first-choice procedure, considering similar rates of short term complications and comparable 1-year oncological and functional outcomes, compared to conventional coloanal anastomosis technique, also avoiding the presence of diverting ileostomy [17] , [20] , [32] , [33] . Furthermore, no significant difference in terms of early post-operative morbidity (frequency of any morbidity, presence of grade 3b morbidity and Comprehensive Complication Index score), has been reported between Turnbull-Cutait technique and standard one-stage coloanal anastomosis [18] , [19] , [34] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through procedure [15] , [16] was described as first choice treatment in colorectal surgery, especially in patients with mid-rectal cancer and in children with Hirshsprung's disease, until the advent of the stapling technique, and now remains an obsolete treatment, useful as second choice option in re-operated and irradiated pelvis, in chronic infection and also when a covering stoma is refused or dangerous [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] . This is a two-stage technique, including a first step which contemplates low anterior resection, with extraction from the anus of a variable segment of colon, generally about 8-10 cm, that is left in place without suturing; the second step consists in resection of the exteriorized colon and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis, which are performed after 8–10 days [21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Protocol elaborated and implemented Evaluation study of delayed colo-anal anastomoses. A study was conducted to evaluate this technique [ 39 ] Establish criteria for transferring patients from the ICU to the ward. Protocols to optimize patients' transfer from the ICU to the surgical ward.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Morocco, training in universities is focused on basic laparoscopic skills, and there is no specific training in advanced laparoscopic procedures [ 25 ]. Surgeons performing advanced mini-invasive techniques got their training in Europe, mostly at their own expenses [ 26 ]. This explains the low number of surgeons performing laparoscopic colectomies and the variability of using laparoscopy between centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%