2004
DOI: 10.1145/974781.974782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-step error estimators for implicit Runge--Kutta methods applied to stiff systems

Abstract: This paper is concerned with local error estimation in the numerical integration of stiff systems of ordinary differential equations by means of Runge-Kutta methods. With implicit Runge-Kutta methods it is often difficult to embed a local error estimate with the appropriate order and stability properties. In this paper local error estimation based on the information from the last two integration steps (that are supposed to have the same steplength) is proposed. It is shown that this technique, applied to Radau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where B is the mass matrix and X and U are the vectors representing the mesh and solution, respectively. This ODE system is integrated from t n to t n+1 = t n + ∆t n using the fifth-order Radau IIA method, with ∆t n being determined by a standard time step size selection procedure (e.g., see Hairer et al [23,Section II.4]) and using a two-step error estimator of Gonzalez-Pinto et al [22]. The relative and absolute tolerances rtol = 10 −6 and atol = 10 −8 are taken in the computation.…”
Section: Finite Element Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where B is the mass matrix and X and U are the vectors representing the mesh and solution, respectively. This ODE system is integrated from t n to t n+1 = t n + ∆t n using the fifth-order Radau IIA method, with ∆t n being determined by a standard time step size selection procedure (e.g., see Hairer et al [23,Section II.4]) and using a two-step error estimator of Gonzalez-Pinto et al [22]. The relative and absolute tolerances rtol = 10 −6 and atol = 10 −8 are taken in the computation.…”
Section: Finite Element Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth-order Radau IIA method is used in time discretization; if you are interested in more details, please refer to [44]. From the method, we can determine the time step̃; if the real time step̃< , the next time level, the mesh coordinate, and the time step of next time level update: +1 ← +̃, X +1 ← X +̃Ẋ , and +1 ←̃.…”
Section: The Implementation Of the Methods Combined With Finite Elemenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting , into and taking ψ = ϕ i , i = 1, …, N vi successively, we get j=1Nitalicvi()Ω()tϕjϕi0.5emdbold-italicxitalicdvjdt=Ω()tvh·()trueX˙ϕimvhϕi0.5emdbold-italicx+()1mΩ()tvh2ϕi0.5emdbold-italicx,1emi=1,,Nvi, which can be written into the matrix form as Bbold-italicXbold-italicV˙=Fbold-italicVbold-italicXtrueX˙, where B is the mass matrix, and X and V are vectors representing the mesh and solution, respectively. The ODE system is integrated from t n to t n +1 using the fifth‐order Radau IIA method (an implicit Runge–Kutta method) with a standard time step selection procedure where the relative and absolute tolerance are chosen as 10 −6 and 10 −8 , respectively, and the error estimation is based on a two‐step error estimator of Gonzalez‐Pinto et al .…”
Section: The Moving Mesh Femmentioning
confidence: 99%