2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(00)01425-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-state model of conformational fluctuation in a DNA hairpin-loop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ii) Folding structures for all the DNA sticky ends must be minimized. Secondary structures, such as loops and hairpins, reduce the number of active ends, and hence the binding free energy and melting temperature (26,(28)(29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Polygamous Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ii) Folding structures for all the DNA sticky ends must be minimized. Secondary structures, such as loops and hairpins, reduce the number of active ends, and hence the binding free energy and melting temperature (26,(28)(29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Polygamous Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of classical physical studies led to the assumption that the unfolding of short DNA fragments is reversible and follows a two-state mechanism, starting at d(A·T) pairs. [1][2][3] Nevertheless, this traditional view has been recently challenged [4][5][6][7][8][9] by ultrafast techniques, which suggested a more complex scenario where compact intermediates are detected during the microsecond-long unfolding process.[4] Unfortunately, these experiments were not able to provide atomistic-detailed information on the process, thus making necessary the use of simulation techniques (mainly molecular dynamics, MD) as complementary tools. For computational reasons MD simulations of unfolding have typically followed indirect approaches, such as the use of multiple short trajectories, [10,11] replica exchange, [12,13] or moderately large (100 ns) simulations under nonphysical denaturing conditions (T = 400 K).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of classical physical studies led to the assumption that the unfolding of short DNA fragments is reversible and follows a two-state mechanism, starting at d(A·T) pairs. [1][2][3] Nevertheless, this traditional view has been recently challenged [4][5][6][7][8][9] by ultrafast techniques, which suggested a more complex scenario where compact intermediates are detected during the microsecond-long unfolding process. [4] Unfortunately, these experiments were not able to provide atomistic-detailed information on the process, thus making necessary the use of simulation techniques (mainly molecular dynamics, MD) as complementary tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%