2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11041-016-0018-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Stage Heat Treatment of Steel 30CrMnSi and Its Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the diffraction angle of α (200) plane for the SQ1 specimen occurred at 64.68°, and with further increase in holding times from 1 to 5, 15, and 30 min at 720 °C, the corresponding diffraction angles of α (200) plane increased to 64.88°, 64.90°, and 64.93°, respectively. According to the Bragg's equation [ 29 ] shown, this deviation is mainly caused by the reduction of lattice distortion of martensite or ferrite microphases.2normaldsinθ=λ$$2 \text{d} sin \theta = \lambda$$d=a/h2+k2+L2$$d = a / \sqrt{h^{2} + k^{2} + L^{2}}$$where d is the interplanar spacing (Å), θ is the diffraction angle between the incident X‐ray and lattice plane (°), λ is the wavelength of incident ray (Cu Kα radiation: 1.54184 Å), and a is the lattice parameters (Å). According to Bragg's equation, the diffraction angle is inversely proportional to the interplanar spacing, which decreased with the increase in SQ holding times from 1 to 30 min at 720 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed that the diffraction angle of α (200) plane for the SQ1 specimen occurred at 64.68°, and with further increase in holding times from 1 to 5, 15, and 30 min at 720 °C, the corresponding diffraction angles of α (200) plane increased to 64.88°, 64.90°, and 64.93°, respectively. According to the Bragg's equation [ 29 ] shown, this deviation is mainly caused by the reduction of lattice distortion of martensite or ferrite microphases.2normaldsinθ=λ$$2 \text{d} sin \theta = \lambda$$d=a/h2+k2+L2$$d = a / \sqrt{h^{2} + k^{2} + L^{2}}$$where d is the interplanar spacing (Å), θ is the diffraction angle between the incident X‐ray and lattice plane (°), λ is the wavelength of incident ray (Cu Kα radiation: 1.54184 Å), and a is the lattice parameters (Å). According to Bragg's equation, the diffraction angle is inversely proportional to the interplanar spacing, which decreased with the increase in SQ holding times from 1 to 30 min at 720 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the diffraction angle of α (200) plane for the SQ1 specimen occurred at 64.68°, and with further increase in holding times from 1 to 5, 15, and 30 min at 720 °C, the corresponding diffraction angles of α (200) plane increased to 64.88°, 64.90°, and 64.93°, respectively. According to the Bragg's equation [29] shown, this deviation is mainly caused by the reduction of lattice distortion of martensite or ferrite microphases.…”
Section: Electron Microscopy and Alloying Element Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the effect of austenitisation at three different temperatures followed by an ageing treatment to stimulate precipitation in the martensite that forms after cooling from the austenite phase field. Multiple precipitate ageing treatments are a common feature of processing [ 20 , 21 ] they introduce variety in the precipitate population and can induce the formation of additional phases. It is demonstrated how such a two-stage treatment can have dramatic effect on the mechanical properties of an alloy, data that are explained on the basis of detailed microstructural characterisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%