2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned before, Constraint (16) can be obtained by summation of Constraints (17) and (18), so it is redundant. Besides, Constraint (18) can be obtained by summation of two constraints summarized in Constraint (19), so this one is redundant, too. Li utilized Bellman and Zadeh's max-min operator and proposed a two-phase approach [29] using max-min operator as phase I; The optimal solution obtained by phase I was supplemented with the constraints of the problem as the minimum solution value in phase II.…”
Section: Multi-objective Methodology For Ndeamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned before, Constraint (16) can be obtained by summation of Constraints (17) and (18), so it is redundant. Besides, Constraint (18) can be obtained by summation of two constraints summarized in Constraint (19), so this one is redundant, too. Li utilized Bellman and Zadeh's max-min operator and proposed a two-phase approach [29] using max-min operator as phase I; The optimal solution obtained by phase I was supplemented with the constraints of the problem as the minimum solution value in phase II.…”
Section: Multi-objective Methodology For Ndeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al modeled a two-stage structure by assuming the inputs to the second stage, including both the outputs from the rst stage and additional inputs to the second stage [18]. Recently, Liu et al tried to systematically examine two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs [19]. Besides, Matin and Azizi introduced a uni ed general model for e ciency evaluation of network production systems when arbitrary relations between individual subprocesses were allowed [20].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also would like to point out that other DEA methodologies have been used to assess the efficiency of banks; for example, Network DEA (e.g., Matthews 2013; Grigoroudis et al 2013;Akther et al 2013;Fukuyama and Matousek 2017;Gulati and Kumar 2017), Network DEA with undesirable variables (e.g., An et al 2015;Liu et al 2015), Dynamic DEA (e.g., Avkiran and Goto 2011;Fukuyama andWeber 2015, 2017), Dynamic Network DEA (e.g., Avkiran 2015;Chao et al 2015;Fukuyama andWeber 2015, 2017;Zha et al 2016;Wu et al 2016;Fukuyama and Weber 2017b), Fuzzy DEA (e.g., Wang et al 2014;Wanke et al 2016;Hatami-Marbini et al 2017), DEA with Bootstrapping (e.g., Ferrier and Hirschberg 1997), Fuzzy DEA with Bootstrapping (e.g., Wanke et al 2016), and Stochastic DEA (e.g., Kao and Liu 2009). For a recent survey, we refer the reader to Kaffash and Marra (2017).…”
Section: Landscape Of Research On Efficiency Assessment In Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some real applications, production process may also use undesirable inputs and generate undesirable outputs [69], like smoke pollution or waste [78,79]. Consequently, authors of [80,81] have stated that in that production process both desirable and undesirable factors may be presented within the models of DEA methodology.…”
Section: Description Of Non-radial Dea Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%