2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00026-014-0227-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Stacks in Series: A Decreasing Stack Followed by an Increasing Stack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If σ = 12, we have the following result, which completely characterize and enumerate 12-sortable permutations. We remark that the 12-machine is different from the one considered in [9], which is constituted by a decreasing stack and an increasing stack connected in series.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If σ = 12, we have the following result, which completely characterize and enumerate 12-sortable permutations. We remark that the 12-machine is different from the one considered in [9], which is constituted by a decreasing stack and an increasing stack connected in series.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Another possible variation on the two-stacks problem is to impose some restrictions on the content of the stack. Rebecca Smith [9] has studied the case in which the first stack is required to be decreasing. Notice that, if we do not choose a specific algorithm in advance, the second stack turns out to be necessarily increasing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• study the machine consisting of two passes through the DI machine described in [10]: are there analogies with West 2-stack-sortable permutations?…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
We introduce a sorting machine consisting of k + 1 stacks in series: the first k stacks can only contain elements in decreasing order from top to bottom, while the last one has the opposite restriction. This device generalizes [10], which studies the case k = 1. Here we show that, for k = 2, the set of sortable permutations is a class with infinite basis, by explicitly finding an antichain of minimal nonsortable permutations.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knuth characterised the set of permutations that can be sorted by a single pass through an infinite stack as the set of permutations that avoid 231 [11]. Since then many variants of the problem have been studied, for example [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The set of permutations sortable by a stack of depth 2 and an infinite stack in series has a basis of 20 permutations [7], while for two infinite stacks in series there is no finite basis [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%