Two Sparsities Are Better Than One: Unlocking the Performance Benefits of Sparse-Sparse Networks

Abstract

In principle, sparse neural networks should be significantly more efficient than traditional dense networks. Neurons in the brain exhibit two types of sparsity; they are sparsely interconnected and sparsely active. These two types of sparsity, called weight sparsity and activation sparsity, when combined, offer the potential to reduce the computational cost of neural networks by two orders of magnitude. Despite this potential, today's neural networks deliver only modest performance benefits using just weight sparsity, because traditional computing hardware cannot efficiently process sparse networks. In this article we introduce Complementary Sparsity, a novel technique that significantly improves the performance of dual sparse networks on existing hardware. We demonstrate that we can achieve high performance running weight-sparse networks, and we can multiply those speedups by incorporating activation sparsity. Using Complementary Sparsity, we show up to 100X improvement in throughput and energy efficiency performing inference on FPGAs. We analyze scalability and resource tradeoffs for a variety of kernels typical of commercial convolutional networks such as ResNet-50 and MobileNetV2. Our results with Complementary Sparsity suggest that weight plus activation sparsity can be a potent combination for efficiently scaling future AI models.

Unlocking the Potential of Two-Point Cells for Energy-Efficient and Resilient Training of Deep Nets

“…The latter are difficult to exploit on modern hardware technology that is typically designed for regular dense data structures. Recently, a few approaches such as [58] have shown lower resource utilisation based on complementary kernel sparsity, however their application to real-world big data problems is yet to be demonstrated.…”