2020
DOI: 10.21595/jve.2020.21056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-span bridge under moving load – numerical and experimental approach

Abstract: From the point of view of bridge structures, the moving load is one of the most important components of the load. The analysis of the influence of moving load on bridges is carried out numerically or experimentally and can be traced in the literature since the year 1849. The first impulse was the collapse of the Chester Rail Bridge in England in the year 1847. The present paper analyses the effect of the moving load on a two-span bridge, both numerical and experimental way. The planar model of the vehicle and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the element size 50 mm was carefully chosen for the sake of optimality and efficiency. For the moving load problem, a numerical example from Yang and Yau [ 25 ] and the test results of a moving mass on a two-span continuous beam from [ 38 ] were selected to verify the FEM simulation. The dynamic responses of the midspan deflections have been plotted in Figure 9 , which are within the rational error margins with those of the reference.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Prestressed Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the element size 50 mm was carefully chosen for the sake of optimality and efficiency. For the moving load problem, a numerical example from Yang and Yau [ 25 ] and the test results of a moving mass on a two-span continuous beam from [ 38 ] were selected to verify the FEM simulation. The dynamic responses of the midspan deflections have been plotted in Figure 9 , which are within the rational error margins with those of the reference.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Prestressed Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%