Two Small RNAs Conserved in Enterobacteriaceae Provide Intrinsic Resistance to Antibiotics Targeting the Cell Wall Biosynthesis Enzyme Glucosamine-6-Phosphate Synthase
Abstract:Formation of glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN6P) by enzyme GlcN6P synthase (GlmS) represents the first step in bacterial cell envelope synthesis. In Escherichia coli, expression of glmS is controlled by small RNAs (sRNAs) GlmY and GlmZ. GlmZ activates the glmS mRNA by base-pairing. When not required, GlmZ is bound by adapter protein RapZ and recruited to cleavage by RNase E inactivating the sRNA. The homologous sRNA GlmY activates glmS indirectly. When present at high levels, GlmY sequesters RapZ by an RNA mimicr… Show more
“…( Figs 5 and 6). In conclusion, the increase of GlmY* steady-state levels observed upon GlcN6P depletion in the current ( Fig 1A) and previous work (Reichenbach et al, 2008(Reichenbach et al, , 2009Khan et al, 2016) results from two distinct activities of RapZ: upregulation of glmY transcription through QseE/QseF and stabilization of GlmY* through its binding. We further identify a negative feedback loop that limits glmY expression under GlcN6P starvation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Once replenished, GlcN6P releases RapZ from complexes with GlmY*, which is in turn rapidly degraded due to lack of protection (Figs and ). In conclusion, the increase of GlmY* steady‐state levels observed upon GlcN6P depletion in the current (Fig A) and previous work (Reichenbach et al , , ; Khan et al , ) results from two distinct activities of RapZ: upregulation of glmY transcription through QseE/QseF and stabilization of GlmY* through its binding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…To trigger GlcN6P depletion, we used Nva‐FMDP, a synthetic derivative of an antibiotic, which selectively inhibits GlmS enzymatic activity and causes exhaustion of intracellular GlcN6P (Chmara et al , ). We previously demonstrated that Nva‐FMDP upregulates glmS expression in a concentration‐dependent manner through activation of the GlmY/GlmZ system and the presence of an exogenous amino sugar overrides this effect (Khan et al , ). Cultures grown to exponential phase were split, and sub‐cultures were provided with a sub‐inhibitory concentration of Nva‐FMDP or H 2 O as mock control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If not available, GlcN6P must be synthesized by GlmS (Milewski, ). GlmS is also target for antibiotics produced by other microorganisms and GlmY/GlmZ provide protection as they overcome inhibition by increasing GlmS amounts (Khan et al , ), a defense that could not be achieved by allosteric regulation of the enzyme. Hence, the need for GlcN6P synthesis may strongly vary during the bacterial life cycle and GlmS activity needs tight and instant control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sponging of protein or sRNA by decoy RNAs has emerged as a widespread principle in bacterial post-transcriptional regulation (Sonnleitner & Bläsi, 2014;Miyakoshi et al, 2015;Romeo & Babitzke, 2018). GlmY specifically accumulates and counters GlmZ decay, when GlcN6P levels decrease (Reichenbach et al, 2008;Khan et al, 2016). Accordingly, GlmS amounts increase and GlcN6P is replenished.…”
The RNA‐binding protein RapZ cooperates with small RNAs (sRNAs) GlmY and GlmZ to regulate the glmS mRNA in Escherichia coli. Enzyme GlmS synthesizes glucosamine‐6‐phosphate (GlcN6P), initiating cell envelope biosynthesis. GlmZ activates glmS expression by base‐pairing. When GlcN6P is ample, GlmZ is bound by RapZ and degraded through ribonuclease recruitment. Upon GlcN6P depletion, the decoy sRNA GlmY accumulates through a previously unknown mechanism and sequesters RapZ, suppressing GlmZ decay. This circuit ensures GlcN6P homeostasis and thereby envelope integrity. In this work, we identify RapZ as GlcN6P receptor. GlcN6P‐free RapZ stimulates phosphorylation of the two‐component system QseE/QseF by interaction, which in turn activates glmY expression. Elevated GlmY levels sequester RapZ into stable complexes, which prevents GlmZ decay, promoting glmS expression. Binding of GlmY also prevents RapZ from activating QseE/QseF, generating a negative feedback loop limiting the response. When GlcN6P is replenished, GlmY is released from RapZ and rapidly degraded. We reveal a multifunctional sRNA‐binding protein that dynamically engages into higher‐order complexes for metabolite signaling.
“…( Figs 5 and 6). In conclusion, the increase of GlmY* steady-state levels observed upon GlcN6P depletion in the current ( Fig 1A) and previous work (Reichenbach et al, 2008(Reichenbach et al, , 2009Khan et al, 2016) results from two distinct activities of RapZ: upregulation of glmY transcription through QseE/QseF and stabilization of GlmY* through its binding. We further identify a negative feedback loop that limits glmY expression under GlcN6P starvation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Once replenished, GlcN6P releases RapZ from complexes with GlmY*, which is in turn rapidly degraded due to lack of protection (Figs and ). In conclusion, the increase of GlmY* steady‐state levels observed upon GlcN6P depletion in the current (Fig A) and previous work (Reichenbach et al , , ; Khan et al , ) results from two distinct activities of RapZ: upregulation of glmY transcription through QseE/QseF and stabilization of GlmY* through its binding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…To trigger GlcN6P depletion, we used Nva‐FMDP, a synthetic derivative of an antibiotic, which selectively inhibits GlmS enzymatic activity and causes exhaustion of intracellular GlcN6P (Chmara et al , ). We previously demonstrated that Nva‐FMDP upregulates glmS expression in a concentration‐dependent manner through activation of the GlmY/GlmZ system and the presence of an exogenous amino sugar overrides this effect (Khan et al , ). Cultures grown to exponential phase were split, and sub‐cultures were provided with a sub‐inhibitory concentration of Nva‐FMDP or H 2 O as mock control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If not available, GlcN6P must be synthesized by GlmS (Milewski, ). GlmS is also target for antibiotics produced by other microorganisms and GlmY/GlmZ provide protection as they overcome inhibition by increasing GlmS amounts (Khan et al , ), a defense that could not be achieved by allosteric regulation of the enzyme. Hence, the need for GlcN6P synthesis may strongly vary during the bacterial life cycle and GlmS activity needs tight and instant control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sponging of protein or sRNA by decoy RNAs has emerged as a widespread principle in bacterial post-transcriptional regulation (Sonnleitner & Bläsi, 2014;Miyakoshi et al, 2015;Romeo & Babitzke, 2018). GlmY specifically accumulates and counters GlmZ decay, when GlcN6P levels decrease (Reichenbach et al, 2008;Khan et al, 2016). Accordingly, GlmS amounts increase and GlcN6P is replenished.…”
The RNA‐binding protein RapZ cooperates with small RNAs (sRNAs) GlmY and GlmZ to regulate the glmS mRNA in Escherichia coli. Enzyme GlmS synthesizes glucosamine‐6‐phosphate (GlcN6P), initiating cell envelope biosynthesis. GlmZ activates glmS expression by base‐pairing. When GlcN6P is ample, GlmZ is bound by RapZ and degraded through ribonuclease recruitment. Upon GlcN6P depletion, the decoy sRNA GlmY accumulates through a previously unknown mechanism and sequesters RapZ, suppressing GlmZ decay. This circuit ensures GlcN6P homeostasis and thereby envelope integrity. In this work, we identify RapZ as GlcN6P receptor. GlcN6P‐free RapZ stimulates phosphorylation of the two‐component system QseE/QseF by interaction, which in turn activates glmY expression. Elevated GlmY levels sequester RapZ into stable complexes, which prevents GlmZ decay, promoting glmS expression. Binding of GlmY also prevents RapZ from activating QseE/QseF, generating a negative feedback loop limiting the response. When GlcN6P is replenished, GlmY is released from RapZ and rapidly degraded. We reveal a multifunctional sRNA‐binding protein that dynamically engages into higher‐order complexes for metabolite signaling.
Although the prevalence of antibiotic resistance is increasing at an alarming rate, there are a dwindling number of effective antibiotics available. Thus, the development of novel antibacterial agents should be of utmost importance. Peptidoglycan biosynthesis has been and is still an attractive source for antibiotic targets; however, there are several components that remain underexploited. In this review, we examine the enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of one such component, UDP‐N‐acetylglucosamine, an essential building block and precursor of bacterial peptidoglycan. Furthermore, given the presence of a similar biosynthesis pathway in eukaryotes, we discuss the current knowledge on the differences and similarities between the bacterial and eukaryotic enzymes. Finally, this review also summarises the recent advances made in the development of inhibitors targeting the bacterial enzymes.
Riboswitches have received significant attention over the last two decades for their multiple functionalities and great potential for applications in various fields. This article highlights and reviews the recent advances in biosensing and biotherapy. These fields involve a wide range of applications, such as food safety detection, environmental monitoring, metabolic engineering, live cell imaging, wearable biosensors, antibacterial drug targets, and gene therapy. The discovery, origin, and optimization of riboswitches are summarized to help readers better understand their multidimensional applications. Finally, this review discusses the multidimensional challenges and development of riboswitches in order to further expand their potential for novel applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.