2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1806.10272
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two simultaneous actions of big mapping class groups

Abstract: We study two actions of big mapping class groups. The first is an action by isometries on a Gromov-hyperbolic graph. The second is an action by homeomorphisms on a circle in which the vertices of the graph naturally embed.The first two parts of the paper are devoted to the definition of objects and tools needed to introduce these two actions; in particular, we define and prove the existence of equators for infinite type surfaces, we define the hyperbolic graph and the circle needed for the actions, and we desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nested disks. We fix a complete hyperbolic metric of the first kind on R 2 − Cantor (see for example the first part of [3] to construct such a metric). We see R 2 − Cantor as a sphere minus {∞} ∪ Cantor and speak about ∞ and the Cantor set as if they were marked points of the sphere.…”
Section: Dyadic Tree and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nested disks. We fix a complete hyperbolic metric of the first kind on R 2 − Cantor (see for example the first part of [3] to construct such a metric). We see R 2 − Cantor as a sphere minus {∞} ∪ Cantor and speak about ∞ and the Cantor set as if they were marked points of the sphere.…”
Section: Dyadic Tree and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the Gromov-boundary of the loop graph can be identified with the set of cliques of high-filling rays (see [2]). Moreover, the two attractive and repulsive points of the boundary which are fixed by a loxodromic element of the mapping class group are necessarily finite cliques, and have the same cardinal (see [3]). On finite type surfaces, these high-filling rays would roughly correspond to the singular leaves of a minimal foliation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calegari's question was answered by J. Bavard in [4], where she proves that the second bounded cohomology of the mapping class group of the plane minus a Cantor set is in fact infinite dimensional. The study of the second bounded cohomology of big mapping class groups has recently been taken considerably further (see [1], [5], [14], and [17]). In particular, if S has a non-displaceable subsurface, in the terminology of Mann-Rafi [16], then the second bounded cohomology of its mapping class group, H 2 b (Map(S); R), is known to be infinite dimensional (see [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof Let n be the number of planar ends of S. Let G be a non-abelian simple finite group of order greater than n! and suppose G is the isometry group of some hyperbolic structure on S. We first observe that G must act on the planar ends of S trivially: indeed, the action of G on the planar ends of S induces a homomorphism from G to the symmetric group on n letters, but the assumption on the cardinality of G implies that the kernel is non-empty and hence, by the simplicity of G, must be all of G. Using again the work of Bavard-Walker [8], we must have that G is cyclically orderable and thus cyclic, which contradicts our assumption that G is non-abelian.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%